June 2018 AOR - join here
- Thread starter andy108
- Start date
I also find that strange. How can someone change the status of already met eligibility. There are no steps nor any pattern they follow.
Met/Recommended passed are determined by case processing agents and case analysts respectively which still needs to be reviewed & finalized by an officer.
In this case whats the difference between met/recommended pass if they both still have to be reviewed? is it just RR?
My research shows that
Eligibility Met is made by the case processing agent at the Central intake Office
Eligibility Recommended passed is made by the case analyst at any of the VO's (Ottawa, Montreal, etc).
So technically they mean the same thing.
I think this is a one-off case tho. Because @Nishika22 note shows that her eligibility is still Met. I believe most of the October IP2's are awaiting officer's review. No officer has looked into their applications yet.
hmm okay. Not sure if it makes sense to use different things but whatever floats their boat
if you dont mind answering, whats his residence country, stream and aor.
My file was at ottawa till 22nd jan as well so trying to figure out if my officer review is done or not
Difficult to give a timeline but only 1 Medical is expiring in 2 months hope they extend the medical.
It surely can sir... People can make mistakes or interpret things which are not consistent with the policy eventually the officer has the authority to approve the case...
Like for me I am part of the sanctioning committee for my organization and many a times I turn down cases recommended by the branch and regions.
yep I definitely get that. I was surprised cos I thought recommended pass and met meant 2 different things until @tobs cleared it out.
On one side GCMS, CBSA etc notes are really initiative to give applicant near complete information. But I really wish CIC would make their communication better
