waitingInTO
Hero Member
- Nov 14, 2016
- 181
- Category........
- FAM
- Visa Office......
- AVO
- App. Filed.......
- 11-10-2016
- AOR Received.
- 02-11-2016
- File Transfer...
- 15-11-2016
- Med's Request
- 24-10-2017
- Med's Done....
- Upfront - passed
- Interview........
- Not required
- Passport Req..
- 24-10-2017 Submitted 01-12-2017
- VISA ISSUED...
- 23-12-2017
- LANDED..........
- before end of the year
OMG! That is absolutely bad advise to stand by saying no to 4d! Back when I came to canada more than 28 years ago, there were no fingerprints done. However, when I applied with my husband's name in 2016, they found my original UCI number and updated my name to reflect my maiden name. Saying no to 4d is further misrepresentation. Just because your face has changed doesn't mean you have changed. Just because your last name changed doesn't you have changed. If you took a trip to France with your mother back when you are kid and after changed your name, how would you answer the question of "have you ever been to France?" Even if you think that is not the reason @Kwamtin now is the time to correct that error about whether you have been denied before. It's one thing if you were a toddler and don't remember that an application was filed on your behalf, but you were old enough to remember and know very well you were denied.
Sorry if I sound harsh, but you are not making your life easier by ignoring the 4d question.
Sorry if I sound harsh, but you are not making your life easier by ignoring the 4d question.
The thing is, I was not even the applicant. I was a dependent and also a minor. I'm only assuming things right now and not sure if that could be a cause. But we've contacted the MPs office and they're trying to contact who's actually handling my file and know exactly what they want us to provide because we have sent more than enough evidence of our marriage. Maybe it hasn't gotten to their office but we have receipts and a copy of who signed for it via DHL. After the MPs secretary gets back to us latest by Friday we will know what's really going on.
Thanks very much again my dear. I have been talking to maybe wife and other immigration expert she since morning. Now they're saying since they did not give me exact reason for being untruthful about the question 4 d, I should still stand on my grounds because there's no document to back that. No fingerprint and, right now I don't know why they're saying I answered untruthful so if they give me evidence that I answered untruthful, then I can explain to them. For all we know they're just playing a smart one on me. Even my face in 16years ago Is very different from now.
Right now I'm going to focus on the marriage evidence because they sent the same email to my wife excluding the untruthful answer they're saying. I feel they want to just scare me