+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
It seems there’s positive news for Start-Up Visa applicants. Recent amendments to Bill C-12 likely reduce the risk of blanket cancellations. Cancellations now appear limited to case-by-case issues like serious fraud, public safety, public health, or administrative errors. While not 100% final until the bill passes, this seems to give stronger protection to genuine SUV applicants.
Good news. Thanks for sharing
Where did you see that?
 
Good news. Thanks for sharing
Where did you see that?
From many sources, including traditional media and social platforms. Nothing is formal yet, and the final amendment text has not been published. The Liberals obviously support the bill because they are the ones who introduced it, so my main concern was the Bloc Québécois. From what I can infer, the Bloc is not fundamentally opposed to the “public interest” cancellation power and appears willing to support it in principle, but at the same time they have expressed concerns about giving the minister an unchecked or overly broad authority.

The amended version of Bill C‑12 seems to aim at putting some clearer limits and definitions around these “public interest” powers, which may reduce—but not completely remove—the risk of arbitrary cancellations. If the bill passes in its amended form, the government could still cancel or suspend applications or documents, but only in specified situations (fraud/misrepresentation, public safety or public health risks, national security, or obvious administrative errors) and with an obligation to report afterward to Parliament on what was done and why.

Many sources exist, here are two of them:
https://www.cicnews.com/2025/12/com...ve-powers-1263034.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://immicalculator.com/committee-amends-carneys-border-bill-to-limit-sweeping-executive-powers/
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hali-2025
From many sources, including traditional media and social platforms. Nothing is formal yet, and the final amendment text has not been published. The Liberals obviously support the bill because they are the ones who introduced it, so my main concern was the Bloc Québécois. From what I can infer, the Bloc is not fundamentally opposed to the “public interest” cancellation power and appears willing to support it in principle, but at the same time they have expressed concerns about giving the minister an unchecked or overly broad authority.

The amended version of Bill C‑12 seems to aim at putting some clearer limits and definitions around these “public interest” powers, which may reduce—but not completely remove—the risk of arbitrary cancellations. If the bill passes in its amended form, the government could still cancel or suspend applications or documents, but only in specified situations (fraud/misrepresentation, public safety or public health risks, national security, or obvious administrative errors) and with an obligation to report afterward to Parliament on what was done and why.

Many sources exist, here are two of them:
https://www.cicnews.com/2025/12/com...ve-powers-1263034.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://immicalculator.com/committee-amends-carneys-border-bill-to-limit-sweeping-executive-powers/
Sounds good! If that passes Our only enemy is the annual cap for now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hali-2025
Hi,
I submitted PR application in Mar this year and then Work permit applied in April, but heard nothing updated from IRCC so far.
My support letter is from non-priority incubator. Does that mean they are now only processing the applications that are supported by priority-organizations, including the work permit? If it’s true, I have to give up this suv program and try to find the other way to go, right?
I am so shocked when I checked the processing time of work permit and noticed the processing time of PR is more than 10 years from the ircc website. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • Sad
Reactions: Hali-2025
Hi,
I submitted PR application in Mar this year and then Work permit applied in April, but heard nothing updated from IRCC so far.
My support letter is from non-priority incubator. Does that mean they are now only processing the applications that are supported by priority-organizations, including the work permit? If it’s true, I have to give up this suv program and try to find the other way to go, right?
I am so shocked when I checked the processing time of work permit and noticed the processing time of PR is more than 10 years from the ircc website. Thanks.
In regard to the work permit, I’m not aware of any official indication that IRCC is prioritizing work permit applications based on whether the incubator is priority or non-priority. To get a definitive answer, it’s best to ask your supporting incubator directly, as they usually receive updates faster than applicants.


As for giving up the SUV program, you don’t have to. You can still apply for another immigration program while your SUV file remains active. Many applicants keep multiple pathways open.


Regarding processing times, the number shown on the IRCC website is misleading. Based on everything we know so far, the is actually much longer than 10 years, mainly because IRCC still has tens of thousands of untouched files in inventory. The posted number doesn’t reflect the true situation of how long these files sit before an officer even opens them.


One more point: even if your organization is priority-designated, it’s still too early to expect updates. Even priority files are sitting on shelves along with thousands of others. For example, we applied in 2021—when the backlog was smaller and the posted processing time was under 3 years—yet our file still stayed untouched for about two years.
 
In regard to the work permit, I’m not aware of any official indication that IRCC is prioritizing work permit applications based on whether the incubator is priority or non-priority. To get a definitive answer, it’s best to ask your supporting incubator directly, as they usually receive updates faster than applicants.


As for giving up the SUV program, you don’t have to. You can still apply for another immigration program while your SUV file remains active. Many applicants keep multiple pathways open.


Regarding processing times, the number shown on the IRCC website is misleading. Based on everything we know so far, the is actually much longer than 10 years, mainly because IRCC still has tens of thousands of untouched files in inventory. The posted number doesn’t reflect the true situation of how long these files sit before an officer even opens them.


One more point: even if your organization is priority-designated, it’s still too early to expect updates. Even priority files are sitting on shelves along with thousands of others. For example, we applied in 2021—when the backlog was smaller and the posted processing time was under 3 years—yet our file still stayed untouched for about two years.
As the principal applicant under the (SUV program, can I submit an SUV application and, at the same time, apply for other Canadian immigration programs? If this is allowed, I really need to think about whether I should take some additional steps. Are there any immigration pathways that would conflict with an SUV application, for example occupation‑based “in‑demand” programs or employer‑sponsored permanent residence streams?