thanx dear for your reply...i m writing the same as writen on caips noteUnhappy said:I'm not sure by reading your story that you did lie. If your situation changed and you completed the program later, so you are mentioning it now on your application, that's fine. However, if you did not properly account for those years of studying for it then yes, you are in a difficult situation. The thing is, what did you put in that time gap ? Something else ? "I went fishing for 3 years " ? Listen there are a lot of terrorists from that region of the world and I'm not suggesting you are one but Canada's number 1 priority is to keep them out. If you can't account for big chunks of time and even lied about it, you may never get here. You also didn't answer the other poster's question, what is the story behind their notation "Sibling". Is there a family history of political violence or immigration violations ? If that is the case, I think you need to seriously consider that you might never get here. "Too many red flags" as we say.
''Reviewed file and documents submitted ielts = average =Y.0 Passed high school 2007 with 55% average on 5 courses.Pa's core subject marks are social studies =52%;science=59% and math =49% Pa also obtained a certificate in computer engineering from Punjab state board with a 52% average. Pa's marks transcript was reviewed revealing he had received 50% or less for numerous subjects throughout the course of study.He is seeking admission in Sheridan college to study computer engineering tech 2 years Diploma course inspite of his english ability, His sr high marks reflect poor performance in core subjects. I do not conclude he is prepared to successfully study and justify the cost incurred.He has no travel history and lacks establishment in india to a degree to compel his return.based on all the above,he therefore does not complying withvR179.refused''
I got mistake about siblings... So sorry for that