+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

Applications (with AORs received in 2014) under 1/2/3 VO reviews :(

vj1986

Full Member
Mar 4, 2014
26
0
Category........
Visa Office......
CPC Ottawa
NOC Code......
2174
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
3-Feb-2014
Doc's Request.
5-May-2014
AOR Received.
5-Mar-2014
IELTS Request
With application
Med's Request
25 Mar
Med's Done....
26 Mar
Passport Req..
PP req: 11-May // PP delivered to CIC: 14-May // RPRF upfront
VISA ISSUED...
28-may-2015
Hi,

I'm starting this thread for those applications which are put under review by a VO for next one.
My application is currently under 2nd review for the eligibility check as per GCMS notes
timelines:
AOR received: 5-Mar-2014
RCMP requested: May-2014
Medicals: Upfront (acknowledged in eCAS)
RPRF: awaiting
PPR: awaiting

eCAS status: application received :(

Total time since AOR: 8m 28d

Pleas add your cases so that everyone can know how the reviews happen
 

pandaincanada

Member
May 14, 2014
14
0
same here.
I received my AOR on April 25th and my notes are saying that my work responsibilities does not correspond to the NOC Code :( I dont know what else to put for my NOC code. So its under review now!
 

ZingyDNA

Champion Member
Aug 12, 2013
1,252
185
Category........
Visa Office......
CPP-Ottawa
NOC Code......
2111
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
28-06-2013
AOR Received.
28-08-2013
IELTS Request
Sent with Application
Med's Request
21-02-2014 (principal applicant)
Med's Done....
07-03-2014 (both, upfront for spouse)
Passport Req..
10-04-2014
VISA ISSUED...
22-04-2014
LANDED..........
13-06-2014
I believe most applications, if not all applications, have 2 VO's to examine them. My GCMS notes also showed two VO's looked at my file, one basically says everything is fine, and the other confirmed and granted us PR. I don't think there will be a third VO. If the first VO finds issues or is not sure about something, I think the second VO will be more senior and will review and make a final decision. Senior VO's are fewer in numbers so it'll take a while to get one. That's why applications with "review required" from the 1st VO will take quite a bit longer..
 

CEC_1304

Champion Member
Mar 25, 2014
1,922
576
Category........
CEC
LANDED..........
02-May 2015
ZingyDNA said:
I believe most applications, if not all applications, have 2 VO's to examine them. My GCMS notes also showed two VO's looked at my file, one basically says everything is fine, and the other confirmed and granted us PR. I don't think there will be a third VO. If the first VO finds issues or is not sure about something, I think the second VO will be more senior and will review and make a final decision. Senior VO's are fewer in numbers so it'll take a while to get one. That's why applications with "review required" from the 1st VO will take quite a bit longer..
Thanks for sharing ,
So do you mean if first VO put note "Recommendation for ELIG passed" (came thorough my GCMS note), Then also 2nd VO will review it?
Or in this case 2nd VO step will be bypassed ? Any thoughts?
 

CEC_1304

Champion Member
Mar 25, 2014
1,922
576
Category........
CEC
LANDED..........
02-May 2015
dennizgb said:
How do you order those GCMS notes online? How long is waiting?

30 days (max)
find the link below
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/atip/requests-atip.asp

Good Luck
 

ZingyDNA

Champion Member
Aug 12, 2013
1,252
185
Category........
Visa Office......
CPP-Ottawa
NOC Code......
2111
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
28-06-2013
AOR Received.
28-08-2013
IELTS Request
Sent with Application
Med's Request
21-02-2014 (principal applicant)
Med's Done....
07-03-2014 (both, upfront for spouse)
Passport Req..
10-04-2014
VISA ISSUED...
22-04-2014
LANDED..........
13-06-2014
CEC_1304 said:
Thanks for sharing ,
So do you mean if first VO put note "Recommendation for ELIG passed" (came thorough my GCMS note), Then also 2nd VO will review it?
Or in this case 2nd VO step will be bypassed ? Any thoughts?
Well, if there is no outstanding issue mentioned, the second VO will simply confirm the first one didn't make a mistake and approve the application. This is only my guess, though. The second VO could be more thorough...