World War 3 Vs CANADA Immigration 2015/16

[sham_visa]

Hello

1) With recent Turkey Vs Russia conflict.
2) America supporting the Turkey's version of events on shooting Russian fighter jet.
3) World currently looks in 2 pieces, China/Russia Vs NATO.
4) Hillary asking for an urgent response from NATO world on Russia & China to pay the price for recent military events.


Is there a chance on affect of CANADA immigration process, in coming 5-6 months?

 

[One_Topsy]

Hello

1) With recent Turkey Vs Russia conflict.
2) America supporting the Turkey's version of events on shooting Russian fighter jet.
3) World currently looks in 2 pieces, China/Russia Vs NATO.
4) Hillary asking for an urgent response from NATO world on Russia & China to pay the price for recent military events.


Is there a chance on affect of CANADA immigration process, in coming 5-6 months?

How would this affect it?

 

[sham_visa]

How would this affect it?

CANADA is becoming the safest place among developed nations, because of its good foreign policy towards syrian issue.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/programs/metromorning/justin-trudeau-russian-plane-turkey-1.3334313
As Trudeau says: "We've instructed our NATO ambassador to engage in a constructive way with our fellow NATO countries and try to de-escalate what is obviously a tense situation."
CANADA is pulling back all its military from SYRIA because lots of countries are involved in syrian issue with multiple agenda(mainly about the dream of constructing an oil tunnel from SYRIA to Europe via TURKEY).
On the otherside, Hillary is provoking other NATO members to take an urgent decision on Russia&China attacking ISIS and supporting Assad.
Currently many Europeans are moving to CANADA just for security reasons.
“Every time something bad happens in the world, people think of Canada as an optional destination for them."
My stand point is, I support Russia&China in this syrian issue.

Obviously there should be huge immigration amidst world war to safest places.
World war 1 made many people migrate to safer places.

 

[ozlis]

Wow. That is quite the extrapolation.

 

[sham_visa]

Wow. That is quite the extrapolation.

Most of the third world nation citizens move to developed nations for better lifestyle/education.
But I feel, knowing the current global turmoil is more important, before migrating to your destination.

I think, Justin Trudeau is a very matured leader ever elected in CANADIAN political history. He knows his do's and dont's very well.
Wrt Bill C-51, Liberals have resolved Niqab issue, which creates lot of confidence in minority communities of CANADA.

 

[One_Topsy]

Most of the third world nation citizens move to developed nations for better lifestyle/education.
But I feel, knowing the current global turmoil is more important, before migrating to your destination.

I think, Justin Trudeau is a very matured leader ever elected in CANADIAN political history. He knows his do's and dont's very well.
Wrt Bill C-51, Liberals have resolved Niqab issue, which creates lot of confidence in minority communities of CANADA.

Yes, but even then economic immigration is controlled. With the express entry system they can control how many people they allow in. Even with the old system, there are caps and controls, so i don't see how this should be a problem. They can easily stop the system once they reach a point where they feel they don't need economic immigrants.
The UK's HSMP/Tier 1 points based system was similar to EE, and it has now been stopped.
Another aspect is refugee claimants - this can be controlled as well as they are now

 

[adele2011]

What a depressing topic this is. Don't like it at all!

 

[sham_visa]

there are caps and controls

Yes, but the processing would be more rigorous based on religion/origin background, due to recent incidents.

 

[sham_visa]

What a depressing topic this is. Don't like it at all!

It is the topic that every country citizen is currently reading.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mC7Fz0d9H8M

 

[Skywalker_RT]

I think Putin, Clinton, Obama, all of them are just playing scene games only for political reasons. Although we can't exclude the possibility of another world-scale war, they are all aware that their countries have much more to lose than winning by going into a conflict. In the end, all that matters is MONEY!

 

[Ivan.Galv]

As a Russian citizen, I can reply that it is sick to expect WW3. Aliens, WW3, Masons and other b#*censored word* topics are for immature brains to believe.
To be serious - some existential risks always exist: viruses like Ebola, asteroids, hostile AI, war escalation risks and other. But it is never even close to be the main scenario, not even 1% probability.

The middle-length future is positive and good - with friendly Artificial Intelligence invention and great medicine researches that will defeat aging process for everyone and grant unlimited lifespan.
No WW3, no aliens and other cr@p for sick minds.

Remember sick people who used to say that 2014 December was going to be End of the World. And where are those people now? Creating new sick stories for different dates probably.

 

[SpoonRaccoon]

As a Russian citizen, I can reply that it is sick to expect WW3. Aliens, WW3, Masons and other b#*censored word* topics are for immature brains to believe.
To be serious - some existential risks always exist: viruses like Ebola, asteroids, hostile AI, war escalation risks and other. But it is never even close to be the main scenario, not even 1% probability.

The middle-length future is positive and good - with friendly Artificial Intelligence invention and great medicine researches that will defeat aging process for everyone and grant unlimited lifespan.
No WW3, no aliens and other cr@p for sick minds.

Remember sick people who used to say that 2014 December was going to be End of the World. And where are those people now? Creating new sick stories for different dates probably.

WW3 as it happened in WW2 is unlikely to ever happen again. However, we are on the road to WW3 for sure. Weather we will reach the destination or not is uncertain but the scenario the world has is similar as the one that started WW2. Unfair polices.

 

[Ivan.Galv]

WW3 as it happened in WW2 is unlikely to ever happen again. However, we are on the road to WW3 for sure. Weather we will reach the destination or not is uncertain but the scenario the world has is similar as the one that started WW2. Unfair polices.

Almost nothing is certain in this life.
A man may die because of fallen brick from the building's roof, it is uncertain weather it would happen or not too.
Why don't you focus on risks based on it's probability? For example, you have 50% probability to get a cancer during your life, you have 20-30% to get stroke or heart desease. You even may be killed in car accident or random crazy man shooting on a street with 2% probability. And considering all of it you are thinking about WW3 which is less than 1% ?

If you don't want to put right priorities to right risks than start scaring aliens and asteroids too I would say, the chances that aliens exist in so huge universe are even better than WW3 happening

 

[SpoonRaccoon]

Almost nothing is certain in this life.
A man may die because of fallen brick from the building's roof, it is uncertain weather it would happen or not too.
Why don't you focus on risks based on it's probability? For example, you have 50% probability to get a cancer during your life, you have 20-30% to get stroke or heart desease. You even may be killed in car accident or random crazy man shooting on a street with 2% probability. And considering all of it you are thinking about WW3 which is less than 1% ?

If you don't want to put right priorities to right risks than start scaring aliens and asteroids too I would say, the chances that aliens exist in so huge universe are even better than WW3 happening

War is like the stock market. You can't say probability of x% says this stock will go up or down. Stocks are projection over time. The consequences of actions. War is the same. You can't say WW3 is less than 1%. WW3 is, like the stocks, projection over time. We are walking on the road to WW3 just like the world at some point walked through the road to WW2.
So you understand it better you can get killed in a car accident any time but there's a difference between driving in a normal day and driving in a blizzard. WW3 didn't seem very possible 10 years ago(accident driving in a normal day) but lately, WW3 seems more likely(accident driving in a blizzard).
Whether war breaks out or not, Those who live in North America will be in peace. Most wars are always fought in Europe or Middle east. So even in WW3, your probability to get killed by a car accident is higher if you live in North America.

 

[zardoz]

If your mythical WW3 breaks out, the limitations that existed during WW1 and WW2 no longer exist. There is no realistic chance that it would be confined to Europe and the Middle East.

Oh, and by the way, the shortest route for nuclear missiles between Russia and the USA is via Canada...
https://www.freemaptools.com/how-far-is-it-between-moscow_-russia-and-san-francisco_-ca,-united-states.htm