Hello,
I'm preparing the application for my conjugal (or common-law?) partner and her two dependent children. I'm a Canadian citizen living in Canada, commuting to Taiwan every month to work. She and her children are Chilean citizens.
So far, I've found that the information provided in CIC's website is pretty straight forward. However, I do have some questions I'd be grateful if anyone could answer.
1. I've read other threads which say that the only reasons conjugal partner applications may succeed are if we can prove an immigration or legal barrier in getting married. But in CIC's website it says I can sponsor her if "there is a significant degree of attachment between the two of you, implying not just a physical relationship but a mutually interdependent relationship, and you’ve been in a genuine (real) relationship for at least 12 months where marriage or cohabitation (living together) hasn’t been possible because of barriers such as sexual orientation, religious faith, etc." It is not specified if those 12 months must be the last 12 months before applying. In our case, all four of us cohabited together in a marriage-like relationship for 5 years in Chile until mid 2016 when I moved abroad due to work. Since then, we've maintained a long distance relationship with visits in between. It would seem I could sponsor her as a common-law partner instead of as a conjugal partner even though we didn't cohabit together the past year, correct?
2. Somewhat on the same topic, would it be taken strangely that we haven't married even though we cohabited for so long? I'm an atheist, she is a Catholic. But it goes beyond religious beliefs, which they aren't even asked in any of the forms. We've just always felt that marriage hasn't been necessary for the commitment we have to each other and to the children. Naturally, we do intend and would like to take our relationship a step further at some point, but it's been put further down our wish list now that we are not cohabiting together and are unable to enjoy the stability we had when we were.
3. I've had some difficulty answering questions on my residency. I work as an airline pilot and I commute every month from Canada to Taiwan, to work from there, so I reside in both countries. IMM1344 asks for my mailing and residential address. I ended up writing the Canadian one for mailing and the Taiwanese for residency. I want to keep the Canadian for mailing for faster mailing in case they send documents. But I also thought I should specify my Taiwanese address. Should I just specify my Canadian in both to avoid confusions? Further down it asks if I am a Canadian citizen living exclusively outside of Canada. I answered No. Even further down on the same page, it asks if I reside in Canada and in no other country. I answered No. So I believe this might confuse them as it the answers contradict each other. I do plan to provide an explanation on this along with a copy of my contract which explains it is a commuting one. This is a non-Canadian company I work for, by the way. What are your thoughts on this issue and how do you think it would be the best way to present it?
I believe these are it for now. I appreciate the valuable information others have shared on other threads, thank you.
I'm preparing the application for my conjugal (or common-law?) partner and her two dependent children. I'm a Canadian citizen living in Canada, commuting to Taiwan every month to work. She and her children are Chilean citizens.
So far, I've found that the information provided in CIC's website is pretty straight forward. However, I do have some questions I'd be grateful if anyone could answer.
1. I've read other threads which say that the only reasons conjugal partner applications may succeed are if we can prove an immigration or legal barrier in getting married. But in CIC's website it says I can sponsor her if "there is a significant degree of attachment between the two of you, implying not just a physical relationship but a mutually interdependent relationship, and you’ve been in a genuine (real) relationship for at least 12 months where marriage or cohabitation (living together) hasn’t been possible because of barriers such as sexual orientation, religious faith, etc." It is not specified if those 12 months must be the last 12 months before applying. In our case, all four of us cohabited together in a marriage-like relationship for 5 years in Chile until mid 2016 when I moved abroad due to work. Since then, we've maintained a long distance relationship with visits in between. It would seem I could sponsor her as a common-law partner instead of as a conjugal partner even though we didn't cohabit together the past year, correct?
2. Somewhat on the same topic, would it be taken strangely that we haven't married even though we cohabited for so long? I'm an atheist, she is a Catholic. But it goes beyond religious beliefs, which they aren't even asked in any of the forms. We've just always felt that marriage hasn't been necessary for the commitment we have to each other and to the children. Naturally, we do intend and would like to take our relationship a step further at some point, but it's been put further down our wish list now that we are not cohabiting together and are unable to enjoy the stability we had when we were.
3. I've had some difficulty answering questions on my residency. I work as an airline pilot and I commute every month from Canada to Taiwan, to work from there, so I reside in both countries. IMM1344 asks for my mailing and residential address. I ended up writing the Canadian one for mailing and the Taiwanese for residency. I want to keep the Canadian for mailing for faster mailing in case they send documents. But I also thought I should specify my Taiwanese address. Should I just specify my Canadian in both to avoid confusions? Further down it asks if I am a Canadian citizen living exclusively outside of Canada. I answered No. Even further down on the same page, it asks if I reside in Canada and in no other country. I answered No. So I believe this might confuse them as it the answers contradict each other. I do plan to provide an explanation on this along with a copy of my contract which explains it is a commuting one. This is a non-Canadian company I work for, by the way. What are your thoughts on this issue and how do you think it would be the best way to present it?
I believe these are it for now. I appreciate the valuable information others have shared on other threads, thank you.
Last edited: