Big ditto the response by CanV.
The amount of supporting documentation necessary to show where one has been living, working, and otherwise physically located, should not be a huge document dump. The most important documentation would ordinarily be less than a tenth what you indicate, and that is the documentation which will make the difference. If that documentation is not sufficient itself, adding another 1800 pages of documents to the pile is unlikely to change the outcome, unless CIC goes through all that extra paperwork to find inconsistencies justifying a negative outcome.
The efficacy of a document dump is way, way, way overrated.
Identify what really makes a difference and focus on that. Quantity of paper will not make a positive difference.
Yes, of course, submitting too little is still, probably, the more common mistake PRs issued RQ make. But the cure for sending too little is not a huge document dump. The cure is to be smart and responsive, focus on what actually and directly proves where you were living and working, and corroborating declared travel history of course.