I did not claim it was, just that it must be taken into account as a factor.
In this particular case, it seems the PR will not be out of compliance before July or possibly August, and if they return soon (eg end of summer or September), would only be 30-90 days out of compliance. As much of this period does coincide with covid and related travel restrictions (incl travel ban), chances of this factor being considered sufficient for leniency are 'decent.' (A vague statement I think would be hard to disagree with).
Not a guarantee, as I said. Same advice as for most such cases: chances are better the sooner they return.
Worth reiterating: leniency on this entry may not apply to future examinations at point of entry and hence best to not travel until back in compliance. Which may not be realistic for many PRs.