+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

PR refused

Eggii Youngpo

Newbie
Sep 12, 2019
6
0
Refusal letter states that I haven’t met the one year of Canadian experience work because I was still on study permit for beginning part of the period I declared, Thus, I only have ten months of work experience since I got my Post graduate work permit. Now, my current job is NOC C but I have a one year foreign work experience (NOC B),
The last paragraph of the refusal letter mentioned that I can either get a higher language score or gain higher education (i have an MA degree in Canada)

What should I do?

Also, If I increase my language score and reapply under foreign work experience class, do I have to meet proof of funds requirements although am currently working in Canada?
 

scylla

VIP Member
Jun 8, 2010
92,829
20,490
Toronto
Category........
Visa Office......
Buffalo
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
28-05-2010
AOR Received.
19-08-2010
File Transfer...
28-06-2010
Passport Req..
01-10-2010
VISA ISSUED...
05-10-2010
LANDED..........
05-10-2010
Hard to comment without seeing the full text of the refusal letter.
 

Eggii Youngpo

Newbie
Sep 12, 2019
6
0
Here is the full refusal letter,


I have now completed the assessment of your application for a permanent resident visa as a member of the Canadian Experience Class and have determined that you do not meet the requirements for immigration to Canada.

According to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, applicants in the Canadian Experience Class are assessed on the basis of the pass/fail requirements set out in subsection R87.1(2). The assessment of these criteria determines whether a worker with Canadian experience will be able to become economically established in Canada. The criteria are:

 temporary resident status during the qualifying period of work experience in Canada,

 meeting the minimum language proficiency threshold in either English or French, and

 qualifying Canadian skilled work experience.



Your application was assessed based on the occupation(s) which you identified as part of your skilled work experience in Canada:

 “Technical Sales Specialist” with OneTouch Direct dba Inteleservices Canada Inc.



In support of your full-time Canadian work experience with OneTouch Direct dba Inteleservices Canada Inc., you provided a letter of employment which states you have been employed from November 13, 2017 to January 31, 2019 with the company.

However, I note that you did not apply for your post-graduate work permit until March 20, 2018.

As per R186(w), a foreign national may work in Canada without a work permit only if they completed their program of study and they “applied for a work permit before the expiry of that study permit and a decision has not yet been made in respect of their application.” As a holder of a study permit, a foreign national without a work permit is only allowed to engage in full-time work “during a regularly scheduled break between academic sessions” as per R186(v)(iii).

I have reviewed all information available and upon review, I am not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that you have acquired one year of qualifying skilled work experience in Canada as your declared work period from November 13, 2017 to March 20, 2018 was unauthorized.

Subsection 11(1) of the Act states that a foreign national must, before entering Canada, apply to an officer for a visa or for any other document required by the Regulations. The visa or document may be issued if, following an examination, the officer is satisfied that the foreign national is not inadmissible and meets the requirements of this Act.



In addition, according to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act:

11.2 An officer may not issue a visa or other document in respect of an application for permanent residence to a foreign national who was issued an invitation under Division 0.1 to make such an application if – at the time the invitation was issued or at the time the officer received their application – the foreign national did not meet the criteria set out in an instruction given under paragraph 10.3(1)(e) or does not have the qualifications on the basis of which they were ranked under an instruction given under paragraph 10.3(1)(h) and were consequently issued the invitation.



Section 11.2 of the Act requires that information provided in your Express Entry Profile concerning your eligibility to be invited to apply [10.3(1)(e)] as well as the qualifications on the basis of which you were ranked [10.3(1)(h)] be valid both at the time the invitation was issued and at the time the application for permanent residence is received.

As I have found that you no longer meet the minimum criteria to be eligible to be invited to apply set out in an instruction given under 10.3(1)(e), you no longer meet the requirements of Section 11.2 of the Act. I am therefore refusing your application.



You will receive a refund of the Right of Permanent Residence Fee that you have paid.

The decision communicated in this letter constitutes the definitive and final decision on your present application. Your application will be retained, under current Government of Canada file retention guidelines, for a period of two years. Your application forms and supporting documents will not be returned to you. If you should submit a new application it would require new fees and documentation and would need to meet all the requirements in effect at the time the application is submitted.

You must remove your Job Seeker profile from the Job Bank website as you are no longer an Express Entry candidate. You must also remove any references that you are a candidate for Express Entry from any private job board websites, if you used any.

If you still want to come to Canada as a skilled immigrant, you may take steps to improve your competitiveness and register for Express Entry at a later date. For example, you may try to improve your language score or gain a higher level of education. However, you must meet the minimum requirements to enter the Express Entry pool and there is no guarantee that you will be issued another invitation to apply for permanent residence under one of the immigration programs subject to Express Entry.
 

21Goose

VIP Member
Nov 10, 2016
5,247
1,615
AOR Received.
Feb 2017
Also, If I increase my language score and reapply under foreign work experience class, do I have to meet proof of funds requirements although am currently working in Canada?
Yes, you will need to show funds since you're working in a NOC C job. To avoid showing proof of funds, you'll need a valid job offer (read LMIA approved) in a NOC 0,A,B job.
 

21Goose

VIP Member
Nov 10, 2016
5,247
1,615
AOR Received.
Feb 2017
Yeah my PGWP expired while I was awaiting a decision. I am currently on a bridging gap work permit
I'm not 100% certain, but I believe that the Work Permit will not be cancelled along with the PR application, and you can continue to work till it expires. Maybe someone else can confirm.
 

Islander216

Champion Member
Nov 27, 2019
2,109
1,338
It was the OP's fault, he declared he started working for a company full time before he got his PGWP.

As soon as they saw that, it was clear he would not meet the 12 months of Canadian work experience to be a CEC candidate, because part of that work experience was unathorised.
 

Islander216

Champion Member
Nov 27, 2019
2,109
1,338
It's at the discretion of IRCC, even when people are found out for working under the table or exceeding their work hours, it's up to them how severely they deal with the offender.

That's never a good place to be however, where you're banking on them being lenient with you.

As we saw with the case of Jobandeep Sandhu, IRCC has the option of being very severe as well.

That's why you need to play by the rules.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: baltzly

Islander216

Champion Member
Nov 27, 2019
2,109
1,338
Thank you for your reply!

What if the violation is minor, do you think they will be very harsh? For instance, if someone has only one day of unauthorised work and then stops immediately after realising it is wrong, do you think this will be a major issue? I'm now studying immigration law, but I haven't been to figure out if there are different degrees of punishments for offences of different levels of severity.
No, i don't think it will be an issue if it's just a day or something minor like that.

There is a significant range of options for punishments for such offenses, e.g. reducing the length of postgraduate work permits, refusal of PGWP, and of course there is deportation.

It all depends on IRCC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: baltzly

21Goose

VIP Member
Nov 10, 2016
5,247
1,615
AOR Received.
Feb 2017
No, i don't think it will be an issue if it's just a day or something minor like that.

There is a significant range of options for punishments for such offenses, e.g. reducing the length of postgraduate work permits, refusal of PGWP, and of course there is deportation.

It all depends on IRCC.
I concur with @Islander216 - there's a range of options open to IRCC, up to and including deportation. However, the circumstances of each individual case influence the outcome, and IRCC officers aren't going to jump straight to "deport him/her" for every breach of the rules. Some rules are more serious than others, of course, and the best thing to do is try to never break any immigration rules. That way you don't have to worry about depending on the good offices of IRCC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: baltzly

Islander216

Champion Member
Nov 27, 2019
2,109
1,338
Thank you for your reply!

I'm just wondering how much discretion do they have. For example, if a student accidentally worked 22 hours instead of 20 hours for only one week because of negligence or miscalculation of hours, will he or she immediately be considered inadmissible for this minor breach? I am researching the immigration law, but I couldn't find any clauses saying how severe the offence has to be in order for a person to be deported/deemed inadmissible.

Really appreciate your input.
No not at all, this is obviously not a material infraction.

If we take the case of Jobandeep Sandu, he was routinely working full time as a truck driver throughout a substantial part of his time in Canada.

This is why IRCC threw the book at him, because he intentionally flouted the rules over a significant period of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: baltzly

Islander216

Champion Member
Nov 27, 2019
2,109
1,338
It's highly unlikely that on the basis of one excess shift that he would be denied PGWP.

Very unlikely.

I think one of the criteria for how they assess rule-breaking is whether it is done on a consistent basis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: baltzly