Last edited:
Judicial review settlement offer
- Thread starter niloosi
- Start date
@aspirant256 on settlement the refusal chances very very less because if the file is weak ircc will never go for early settlement. I studied 11 study permit cases on JR which went till hearing stages and that is why 8 were dismissed by judge and 3 were granted JR. We often seen here that after successful JR application was again rejected but after settlement letter did anybody get rejected we did not see here. IRCC is not stupid that they offer settlement in the middle of the JR case and then later against refuse. JR granted basically judge decision to redetermin the file so it can be refuse easily but still ircc respect judge decision so they give time to these files and check carefully for visa. I wish to see someone here who refused again after settlement offer
Even on JR the chances of refusal are less and mostly get visas. Zong vs ircc was a very interesting case. A Chinese student from Uk who were granted JR and then on interview in Uk the embassy refused his visa again because not satisfied during interview. The officer objection was he spending money one english course which can take in china and judge argued very angry that its is not visa officer duty to do assessment on cost. Visa officer cannot talk about on applicant how much money he will spend in canada.
I got settlement without any lawyer because on every signle refusal from officer i cross argued with articles , regulations and references.
InshaAllah once i get visa i will share my complete file here to all and people will really enjoy to read..
On chinook 3+ i argued that my file deicision made my chinook. I do not say technology is not perfect but i must say tools and technology may refuse visas of genuine students. In general prospect DRS technology using in cricket decision where empire given out but when DRS used then decisions were not out and there are so many controverses on technology and tools. I am sure IRCC hands up and given settlement which means they are not reading our files qnd chinook doing decisions
I got settlement without any lawyer because on every signle refusal from officer i cross argued with articles , regulations and references.
InshaAllah once i get visa i will share my complete file here to all and people will really enjoy to read..
On chinook 3+ i argued that my file deicision made my chinook. I do not say technology is not perfect but i must say tools and technology may refuse visas of genuine students. In general prospect DRS technology using in cricket decision where empire given out but when DRS used then decisions were not out and there are so many controverses on technology and tools. I am sure IRCC hands up and given settlement which means they are not reading our files qnd chinook doing decisions
I really hope so. I have seen only @Warvan 's case which was refused again after settlement. Let's think positively and hope for the best.
Judging on the cost of studies is like asking people why to buy an iPhone when you can buy an oppo. If one can afford and is willing to spend then nobody should have an objection, that will come down to everything then from a Louis Vuitton handbag to taking a first-class flight. How about CBSA asking why you took a first-class when you could have taken an economy class at the fraction of the cost?
No aspirant is right. Everything is possible but yes its a happier moment because i had believe i can't go canada after 3 refusal and was working on UK plan. But with settlement i got a hope of visa but also its look dream because getting settlement from UAE and abu dhabi office its hard. This office force applicant to go for JR and waste time arround year and more. Its something good news for me and also those victims from abu dhabi office that with JR keep hope of settlement and the reason is they dont study our files and leave everything on chinook software
The refusal reason was same as you got before judicial review or it was different?