How many response/ request from CIC after submitting application?

[willzou]

I guess, but do not know as I am not familiar

1. AOR, email or mail?
2. Invite to test, email or mail?
3. test/interview, on present
4. decision made, email or mail or just status change
5. notify to oath, is this mail or email?
6 oath,

I suppose after 4, there will be no worry any more, isn't it?

 

[Rigly68]

I guess, but do not know as I am not familiar

1. AOR, email or mail?
2. Invite to test, email or mail?
3. test/interview, on present
4. decision made, email or mail or just status change
5. oath

I assume after 4, there will be no worry any more, isn't it?

1. If you provide your email address in the application AOR will be sent by email only. Otherwise it will be mail.
2. Mail as you will have to take the letter with you to the test/interview. Also eCas will be updated.
4. Status update on eCas

 

[willzou]

1. If you provide your email address in the application AOR will be sent by email only. Otherwise it will be mail.
2. Mail as you will have to take the letter with you to the test/interview. Also eCas will be updated.
4. Status update on eCas

you deserve "hero member"
thanks

how about the last question? after decision made, there is no more worry right?

 

[Rigly68]

how about the last question? after decision made, there is no more worry right?

So far everyone on this board that I have seen who received DM did get their oath. But as usual with the fine print...DM means exactly that - decision made - which could also mean a negative decision. But you will get a "feel" for it after your interview... in my case the officer said to now just wait for oath invite and a few days later my status changed to DM.

 

[h3a3j6]

So far everyone on this board that I have seen who received DM did get their oath. But as usual with the fine print...DM means exactly that - decision made - which could also mean a negative decision. But you will get a "feel" for it after your interview... in my case the officer said to now just wait for oath invite and a few days later my status changed to DM.

 

[McClane]

In my wife's case she received an RQ and then, after submitting the materials, she started getting random calls asking for further clarifications or support documents, e.g. something showing she was indeed away during a weekend trip, etc. Two weeks after the calls stopped (maybe 6 calls during three weeks) she got DM on ecas and then the oath invite.

 

[willzou]

In my wife's case she received an RQ and then, after submitting the materials, she started getting random calls asking for further clarifications or support documents, e.g. something showing she was indeed away during a weekend trip, etc. Two weeks after the calls stopped (maybe 6 calls during three weeks) she got DM on ecas and then the oath invite.

1. RQ usually happend before test invite or after interview?
2. RQ usually happened to people who has no professional job and tax history during that period, isn't it?
3. in your wife case, DM still followed by success, so DM is 99.9% good SO FAR

 

[McClane]

1. RQ usually happend before test invite or after interview?
2. RQ usually happened to people who has no professional job and tax history during that period, isn't it?
3. in your wife case, DM still followed by success, so DM is 99.9% good SO FAR

1. She got it after the test and interview (both took place the same day)
2. She had not worked in Canada and, on top of that, had spent a lot of time traveling with me on some long term business trips.
3. Correct

 

[willzou]

1. She got it after the test and interview (both took place the same day)
2. She had not worked in Canada and, on top of that, had spent a lot of time traveling with me on some long term business trips.
3. Correct

thanks, look like the 2nd guess is reasonable.
if people has full time professional job, then leave is only vacation possible which is about 2-3 weeks.
without full time professional job, it will take officials more time to verify stay days.

 

[McClane]

thanks, look like the 2nd guess is reasonable.
if people has full time professional job, then leave is only vacation possible which is about 2-3 weeks.
without full time professional job, it will take officials more time to verify stay days.

I'd say it doesn't have to be a professional job. As long as you have a real and typical job, in the sense that you go to the same place every day, then that job history, along with your tax returns and bills, will provide a solid proof regarding your residence.

For me the challenge is that I work in a field where 95% of our work is in the US and there's a lot of travel there. At some point I was going there for 5-6 straight months. My wife went along a few times and it was reasonable to question her actual place of residence. What helped is that all of my income statements are linked to Canada. I have always been a person employed in Canada.

All this travel is why I cannot even apply. When I fulfill the residence requirements, early next year, I expect to receive an RQ. It just makes sense.