GCMS NOTES WELL EXPLAINED HAS NEVER BEFORE UNTIL NOW

[ImABule]

Hello members , I am Dec 2014 applicant , I have sponsered my spouse .
I think I am in unique nasty situation

I have requested GCMS notes twice . and notes are as belows

In Note 1 its written as " in queue for interview as of 22/11/2015 - can be over 1 year - Spr passed 2015/04/11 - will exceed ) " updated on 03mar2016

In Note 2 its written as " Docs on file and notes below reviewed . Sponsor info including employment letter reviewed . Interview to be scheduled " updated on nov 2015

Please can anyone tell me about is it serious issue ? will it take more than one year ?

How much relationship proof did you provide?

Which VO is the file at?

 

[TANMEX]

I mailed my application on February 23, they received it on February 25, I received AOR1 on March 24, SA April 5, AOR2 April 15.

SA took 40 days. 50 days from filed to AOR2.

And I think they are slow lol.

Buddy !! you are the fastest in this Forum , believe me your timeline is awesome .

Thank god Stephen harper is gone , AOR1 use to take over 70 days .

 

[sibhav]

How much relationship proof did you provide?

Which VO is the file at?

I have provided enough evidence ( 70 photos , emails , gifts recepit , invitation cards ......3.5 kgs )

VO - New Delhi

 

[ImABule]

Buddy !! you are the fastest in this Forum , believe me your timeline is awesome .

Thank god Stephen harper is gone , AOR1 use to take over 70 days .

I know it was faster than some. But I also think that this entire process is ridiculous and that the entire process should take less than 4 months unless there is obvious issues with the criminality/security checks.

 

[ImABule]

I have provided enough evidence ( 70 photos , emails , gifts recepit , invitation cards ......3.5 kgs )

VO - New Delhi

Any obvious red flags?

 

[ImABule]

Buddy !! you are the fastest in this Forum , believe me your timeline is awesome .

Thank god Stephen harper is gone , AOR1 use to take over 70 days .

If you check the February Outland thread there is someone who already has DM. This is how it should be across the board for all VO's.

The Government says family reunification is a priority, well, then prove it. Adding a few more case workers and upping the planned intake is good and all, but I want to see real change in how these applications are processed. It's not rocket science to look at an application and know the couple is genuine. Even if it isn't, I think they should admit everyone who passes medical, security, and criminality and let the undertaking and condition 51 sort them out. I would rather see 0% of genuine couples denied than they maybe stop some non-genuine couples from getting the visa and making false determinations and having even a small percentage of real relationships forced to appeal.

 

[sibhav]

Any obvious red flags?

I tired to visit visa for my wife before our marrige in 2014 . is it cause for inteviwe ?

By the way how can I find red flag in notes >

 

[ImABule]

I tired to visit visa for my wife before our marrige in 2014 . is it cause for inteviwe ?

By the way how can I find red flag in notes >

Shouldn't be cause for an interview. In the notes the comments usually give an idea what the concerns are.

 

[TANMEX]

If you check the February Outland thread there is someone who already has DM. This is how it should be across the board for all VO's.

The Government says family reunification is a priority, well, then prove it. Adding a few more case workers and upping the planned intake is good and all, but I want to see real change in how these applications are processed. It's not rocket science to look at an application and know the couple is genuine. Even if it isn't, I think they should admit everyone who passes medical, security, and criminality and let the undertaking and condition 51 sort them out. I would rather see 0% of genuine couples denied than they maybe stop some non-genuine couples from getting the visa and making false determinations and having even a small percentage of real relationships forced to appeal.

I agree 100% , If they can process a TRV in 3 days , they can do the same for a PR lets say in a Month or 2 .

 

[sibhav]

Shouldn't be cause for an interview. In the notes the comments usually give an idea what the concerns are.

this is the cooment in notes " Docs on file and notes below reviewed . Sponsor info including employment letter reviewed . Interview to be scheduled "

any idea ? why they reviwe employment letter after sponser is approved for elegibilty ?

 

[ImABule]

this is the cooment in notes " Docs on file and notes below reviewed . Sponsor info including employment letter reviewed . Interview to be scheduled "

any idea ? why they reviwe employment letter after sponser is approved for elegibilty ?

They do check up on the sponsors eligibility to make sure that they are still eligible while applications are in process.

Is there nothing else in the notes?

 

[gabba50]

If you check the February Outland thread there is someone who already has DM. This is how it should be across the board for all VO's.

The Government says family reunification is a priority, well, then prove it. Adding a few more case workers and upping the planned intake is good and all, but I want to see real change in how these applications are processed. It's not rocket science to look at an application and know the couple is genuine. Even if it isn't, I think they should admit everyone who passes medical, security, and criminality and let the undertaking and condition 51 sort them out. I would rather see 0% of genuine couples denied than they maybe stop some non-genuine couples from getting the visa and making false determinations and having even a small percentage of real relationships forced to appeal.

If they increase the processing fees with a faster process that fine!(citizenship application now is faster), if concerned of fake wedding they should review conditions 51 and make tight with other conditions....... that loooong waiting time a genuine relationship will become loose

 

[ImABule]

If they increase the processing fees with a faster process that fine!(citizenship application now is faster), if concerned of fake wedding they should review conditions 51 and make tight with other conditions....... that loooong waiting time a genuine relationship will become loose

I would like to see 100% approval with passed Criminality/Medical/Security and if that worries CIC then extend condition 51 to a longer period of time or increase the undertaking length.

 

[preeti2072]

hello everyone
hi just want to ask in notes last 2-3 pages where notes are explained
there after spnsor eligibilty passed
what they have written
Relevant information/material found
OR
No Relevant information/material found
my concern is out of these 2 which is good sign for interview waived
plz reply

 

[flx2015]

I would like to see 100% approval with passed Criminality/Medical/Security and if that worries CIC then extend condition 51 to a longer period of time or increase the undertaking length.

the new govt is actually getting rid of condition 51. what in the world are they thinking?