GCMS NOTES WELL EXPLAINED HAS NEVER BEFORE UNTIL NOW

[Amarpreetd]

can someone please help me.......my freind july 2015 applicant inland spousal sponsership......they married in hurry due to girl's family was against the wedding......so civial marriage....no girl side family present my freind's family was present.....they married couple of weeks before my friend was about to lose (expire) his work permit and received refusal for his ECE....but marraige is genuine.....have a baby since...brought house together....joint accounts......insurance etc....they ordered gcms notes....most fields r blank.....but one page is blocked and mention section 16 (1)(c) ......none of them have any criminal charge etc....at the end most recent entry says..recommended pass....application identifies as part of SIR...and received PCC on 16 june 2016.....any idea what does recommend pass means and why section 16 (1) c...thanks in advance

 

[profiler]

can someone please help me.......my freind july 2015 applicant inland spousal sponsership......they married in hurry due to girl's family was against the wedding......so civial marriage....no girl side family present my freind's family was present.....they married couple of weeks before my friend was about to lose (expire) his work permit and received refusal for his ECE....but marraige is genuine.....have a baby since...brought house together....joint accounts......insurance etc....they ordered gcms notes....most fields r blank.....but one page is blocked and mention section 16 (1)(c) ......none of them have any criminal charge etc....at the end most recent entry says..recommended pass....application identifies as part of SIR...and received PCC on 16 june 2016.....any idea what does recommend pass means and why section 16 (1) c...thanks in advance

You posted this exact message in the INLAND 2015 thread. I answered you there: http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/inland-applications-2015-t255107.0.html;msg5524121#msg5524121

 

[CanaHn]

for those who have shown them on their eligibility: review required!
Dont get scared. this show me in my GSCM notes and my I did not go to intervier. After 9 months, I have PPR.
Thank you Eagle and all the people in this post for help me when I become almost crazy!

 

[momo2016]

for those who have shown them on their eligibility: review required!
Dont get scared. this show me in my GSCM notes and my I did not go to intervier. After 9 months, I have PPR.
Thank you Eagle and all the people in this post for help me when I become almost crazy!

nice...tell me on your notes, did you eligibility went from review required to recommend pass or passed?

 

[chhapa]

can someone please help me.......my freind july 2015 applicant inland spousal sponsership......they married in hurry due to girl's family was against the wedding......so civial marriage....no girl side family present my freind's family was present.....they married couple of weeks before my friend was about to lose (expire) his work permit and received refusal for his ECE....but marraige is genuine.....have a baby since...brought house together....joint accounts......insurance etc....they ordered gcms notes....most fields r blank.....but one page is blocked and mention section 16 (1)(c) ......none of them have any criminal charge etc....at the end most recent entry says..recommended pass....application identifies as part of SIR...and received PCC on 16 june 2016.....any idea what does recommend pass means and why section 16 (1) c...thanks in advance

Section 16 - Law Enforcement & Investigations - Security

16(1)(c)

information the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to be injurious to the enforcement of any law of Canada or a province or the conduct of lawful investigations, including, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, any such information
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/A-1/FullText.html

 

[profiler]

Section 16 - Law Enforcement & Investigations - Security

16(1)(c)

information the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to be injurious to the enforcement of any law of Canada or a province or the conduct of lawful investigations, including, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, any such information
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/A-1/FullText.html

This was an ATIP and not a PA? Who pays for GCMS notes?!

 

[naveedali]

Hello,

My wife is applying for GCMS notes and she's my sponsor and a canadian citizen. We are confused on this question Requesting information on your own behalf? Yes / No What should we select Yes? or No? In the Consent form IMM5744 we gave Principal applicant info in Section A and Sponsor information in section B and C. Also my wife is in Pakistan right now can we still apply for GCMS?

 

[Deffy2016]

Hello,

My wife is applying for GCMS notes and she's my sponsor and a canadian citizen. We are confused on this question Requesting information on your own behalf? Yes / No What should we select Yes? or No? In the Consent form IMM5744 we gave Principal applicant info in Section A and Sponsor information in section B and C. Also my wife is in Pakistan right now can we still apply for GCMS?

The answer is No. she is requesting information on your behalf not hers.

 

[naveedali]

The answer is No. she is requesting information on your behalf not hers.

thanks

 

[ImABule]

Hello,

My wife is applying for GCMS notes and she's my sponsor and a canadian citizen. We are confused on this question Requesting information on your own behalf? Yes / No What should we select Yes? or No? In the Consent form IMM5744 we gave Principal applicant info in Section A and Sponsor information in section B and C. Also my wife is in Pakistan right now can we still apply for GCMS?

Hi

The sponsor is requesting the notes on behalf of the PA. So the answer is no.

PA fills section A and signs. Sponsors info in Section C. Sponsor signs Section C. Section B remains blank.

A citizen can order the notes anywhere in the world.

 

[naveedali]

Hi

The sponsor is requesting the notes on behalf of the PA. So the answer is no.

PA fills section A and signs. Sponsors info in Section C. Sponsor signs Section C. Section B remains blank.

A citizen can order the notes anywhere in the world.

But on the gcms guide which i found from this form says PA fills secrion A and sponsor fills B and C.
What about the email? Should we use sponsor's email or PA on the web form?

 

[ImABule]

But on the gcms guide which i found from this form says PA fills secrion A and sponsor fills B and C.
What about the email? Should we use sponsor's email or PA on the web form?

The sponsors email.

As far as I know, Section B is to be completed for applications in which the spouse is included in the PR app.

 

[naveedali]

The sponsors email.

As far as I know, Section B is to be completed for applications in which the spouse is included in the PR app.

ohh ok thanks

 

[htquach]

Section C is slightly confusing. This is what I have done:

Part 3: Sponsor's information.

Part 4: PA signature as he/she agrees to release their information to the above sponsor. My reasoning is the form is intented for someone (PA) to release their information to someone else (Sponsor), thus the PA should sign here?

Then again, I am at 60+ days since I requested my notes and still have not received. ImABule has waited even longer than I have. So we both may have completed the form incorrectly?

 

[profiler]

PA is Section A
Sponsor is Section C.

They rmailed to ask got me to correct the form and gave me that direction.

That said, I'm passed 60 days, and emailed them as we approached 60 to ask what's up...