+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

gladaki

Champion Member
Jul 15, 2012
1,683
27
Category........
Visa Office......
Ottawa
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
17-11-2013
AOR Received.
30-12-2013
IELTS Request
submitted with application
Med's Done....
Upfront on 29th April..Updated on Ecas on 26th May
Passport Req..
11-07-2014
VISA ISSUED...
17-07-2014
LANDED..........
20-07-2014
Thought of posting my GCMS notes for others, too much work to type all this

GCMS which were generated on 29th july 2013, file was updated on 26th june 2013. Status under review

work exp: NOC 2113 Geophysicist for XXX from 2012/02/21 to 2012/10/11. Duties conform to NOC. Also same position in XXXX from 2011/07/04 to 2012/02/14. Duties confirm to NOC. App recieved on 31st October 2012. Also declare NOC 4122 as RA for University of XXXX. from sep 2008 to May 2011. Duties confirm to NOC. Letter also states that PA was concurrently in school and FOSS details verify the authorization to study. Letter doesnot appear to make any difference between studies and RA. Evidence insufficient to consider tenure as RA to be work ex. instead of studies. Credential granted on 2011/10/11. Eligibility period under student stream appears to be less than one year. Supporting docs appears to be insufficient to demonstrate one year work exp under NOC code...


My new documents are added to file on 6th August, but few members of this forum got rejected becoz their updated documents were not considered so I am not expecting much
 
gladaki said:
work exp: NOC 2113 Geophysicist for XXX from 2012/02/21 to 2012/10/11. Duties conform to NOC. Also same position in XXXX from 2011/07/04 to 2012/02/14. Duties confirm to NOC. App recieved on 31st October 2012. Supporting docs appears to be insufficient to demonstrate one year work exp under NOC code...

Hi gladaki,
just curious why it said that '' Supporting docs appears to be insufficient to demonstrate one year work exp under NOC code''???
By calculating your work exp under NOC 2113, you do have more than 1yr.
 
bluelagoon019 said:
Hi gladaki,
just curious why it said that '' Supporting docs appears to be insufficient to demonstrate one year work exp under NOC code''???
By calculating your work exp under NOC 2113, you do have more than 1yr.
My mistake Canadian credential is
2011/11/10 which is 10 November. Sorry about it