+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

David0211

Full Member
Jun 14, 2024
30
5
Any insight on why EE PNP draws are not happening? Last one was May 25th 2026. Until then, there has been a draw every other week.. but now.. nothing.
I thought it was due to the issue with the French draw last May 28. But as it got fixed last Friday… I was expecting a new draw today…
 
Glitch in the system so working it out. There are no set dates for draws.
I thought they fixed it based on what IRCC posted.

There are no set dates for FSW, CEC, Trades, French, Category based draws, but PNP draws have been happening systematically every other week fore more than 18 months.. as IRCC has a legal obligation to procesd PNP nominations.
 
I thought they fixed it based on what IRCC posted.

There are no set dates for FSW, CEC, Trades, French, Category based draws, but PNP draws have been happening systematically every other week fore more than 18 months.. as IRCC has a legal obligation to procesd PNP nominations.
Where does the IRPA state that? There is no law or legal obligation in the Act to hold PNP draws, invite every nominee, and outline when the draws will happen.
 
Where does the IRPA state that? There is no law or legal obligation in the Act to hold PNP draws, invite every nominee, and outline when the draws will happen.
IRCC has a binding jurisdictional obligation to intake and process those files.
Once a province uses its legally allocated quota to give you a nomination, the federal government is bound by their signed intergovernmental agreements to intake that application for formal processing. They are legally required to give it a fair, thorough administrative review.

Additionally, PNP nominations are issued with an expiration date. They can’t expire just because IRCC didn’t make any draw. For some reason they have been having PNP draws every 2 weeks.

The quota for those pnp nominates has already been agreed, approved and confirmed between the federal and provincial governments.
 
Last edited:
Where does the IRPA state that? There is no law or legal obligation in the Act to hold PNP draws, invite every nominee, and outline when the draws will happen.
To your question…

1. Section 8 of IRPA: The Provincial Power Source
The entire Provincial Nominee Program exists because of Section 8(1) of the Act, which legally empowers the federal Immigration Minister to sign binding contracts with individual provinces.

More importantly, Section 8(2) states that the selection and acquisition of status by foreign nationals must be consistent with these signed federal-provincial agreements. This is the exact section that legally forces IRCC to recognize and process B.C.'s economic selections—they cannot summarily ignore them because the Act commands them to act in consistency with the agreements.


2. Section 10.3 of IRPA: Express Entry Rules
When Express Entry was introduced, the government added new divisions to the Act to handle automated invitations. Under Section 10.3 (1.1 and 2.1), the Act explicitly lays out the rules for the "Provincial Nominee Class" within the digital pool.

It states that the Minister can issue specific "Ministerial Instructions" to pull candidates who hold a nomination issued under a Section 8 agreement. This is the exact legal authority IRCC uses every time they run a PNP-specific draw.


3. Section 8(3): The Absolute Federal Veto
This is where the federal government protects its absolute supreme authority. Immediately after saying processing must align with provincial agreements, the Act drops Section 8(3), which explicitly states:

"Subsection (2) is not to be interpreted as limiting the application of any provision of this Act concerning inadmissibility to Canada."

This single sentence is the legal baseline for the independent federal review. It gives IRCC the absolute, unchallengeable statutory right to reject a provincial nominee if they fail federal checks on health, criminality, security, or misrepresentation.
 
To your question…

1. Section 8 of IRPA: The Provincial Power Source
The entire Provincial Nominee Program exists because of Section 8(1) of the Act, which legally empowers the federal Immigration Minister to sign binding contracts with individual provinces.

More importantly, Section 8(2) states that the selection and acquisition of status by foreign nationals must be consistent with these signed federal-provincial agreements. This is the exact section that legally forces IRCC to recognize and process B.C.'s economic selections—they cannot summarily ignore them because the Act commands them to act in consistency with the agreements.


2. Section 10.3 of IRPA: Express Entry Rules
When Express Entry was introduced, the government added new divisions to the Act to handle automated invitations. Under Section 10.3 (1.1 and 2.1), the Act explicitly lays out the rules for the "Provincial Nominee Class" within the digital pool.

It states that the Minister can issue specific "Ministerial Instructions" to pull candidates who hold a nomination issued under a Section 8 agreement. This is the exact legal authority IRCC uses every time they run a PNP-specific draw.


3. Section 8(3): The Absolute Federal Veto
This is where the federal government protects its absolute supreme authority. Immediately after saying processing must align with provincial agreements, the Act drops Section 8(3), which explicitly states:

"Subsection (2) is not to be interpreted as limiting the application of any provision of this Act concerning inadmissibility to Canada."

This single sentence is the legal baseline for the independent federal review. It gives IRCC the absolute, unchallengeable statutory right to reject a provincial nominee if they fail federal checks on health, criminality, security, or misrepresentation.
Where are you getting this. There is no section 8(3) or 10.3. No "Absolute Federal Veto". There is no mention of Express Entry rules.

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/i-2.5/index.html


Nothing to state that they must hold draws within specified times. They could have one a year. The provinces haven't pushed the feds for a draw. If you have an issue with the law then tell the provinces to force a draw. But nothing in the act stating that.
 
Last edited: