Leon or someone:
Could you please clarify how to interpret days spent in Canada coming in as visitor on PR to accumulate residency VERSUS actually moving here to reside full time including getting SIN, Div Licence, filing taxes etc and how former days factor into citizenship. To make it easier, let me make up a simple scenario:
Came up to Canada for visits say between Dec 2009 - Apr 2010 - 64 days accumulated in total before moving to live here full time;
ACTUALLY MOVED TO LIVE HERE FULL TIME -- AUG 1, 2010 onwards;
Put in 3 years living here full time till -------------------------------- AUG 2013;
To make it simple, let say after moving here one left Canada for a total of 64 days between Aug 2010 - Aug 2013; For citizenship purposes, the rule is looking back 4 years from the date of application for citizenship one has atleast 1095 days. Also Note: to make the math easy I have given the same numbers. We dont need to get into the fact that for PR both entry/exit days from trip count whereas for citizenship only one day counts. All that is factored in as we are not getting into that aspect.
NOW MY QUESTION: Between 2013 (date of citizenship application) and 2009 (going back 4 years), How do I interpret what I have accumulated: (a) Do I have 1095 days since the 64 days cancel each other out; OR (b) does the 64 days accumulated BEFORE moving to live here full time NOT count (except for PR) and therefore since I exited 64 days overall- I have to do atleast 64 more days after Aug 2013 before I hit 1095 days since , as noted earlier, the 64 days I accumulated in Canada before moving to live here full time dont count for citizenship ?
I have a feeling I may be off. It has to be either Option (a) or (b). Only (a) is more accomodating even of days one put in as a visitor before moving in but (b) is more strict that ALL days towards the 1095 for citizenship have to have been earned after moving to live here full time - which in this case was AUG 2010 ???? Confused...please clarify.....
Could you please clarify how to interpret days spent in Canada coming in as visitor on PR to accumulate residency VERSUS actually moving here to reside full time including getting SIN, Div Licence, filing taxes etc and how former days factor into citizenship. To make it easier, let me make up a simple scenario:
Came up to Canada for visits say between Dec 2009 - Apr 2010 - 64 days accumulated in total before moving to live here full time;
ACTUALLY MOVED TO LIVE HERE FULL TIME -- AUG 1, 2010 onwards;
Put in 3 years living here full time till -------------------------------- AUG 2013;
To make it simple, let say after moving here one left Canada for a total of 64 days between Aug 2010 - Aug 2013; For citizenship purposes, the rule is looking back 4 years from the date of application for citizenship one has atleast 1095 days. Also Note: to make the math easy I have given the same numbers. We dont need to get into the fact that for PR both entry/exit days from trip count whereas for citizenship only one day counts. All that is factored in as we are not getting into that aspect.
NOW MY QUESTION: Between 2013 (date of citizenship application) and 2009 (going back 4 years), How do I interpret what I have accumulated: (a) Do I have 1095 days since the 64 days cancel each other out; OR (b) does the 64 days accumulated BEFORE moving to live here full time NOT count (except for PR) and therefore since I exited 64 days overall- I have to do atleast 64 more days after Aug 2013 before I hit 1095 days since , as noted earlier, the 64 days I accumulated in Canada before moving to live here full time dont count for citizenship ?
I have a feeling I may be off. It has to be either Option (a) or (b). Only (a) is more accomodating even of days one put in as a visitor before moving in but (b) is more strict that ALL days towards the 1095 for citizenship have to have been earned after moving to live here full time - which in this case was AUG 2010 ???? Confused...please clarify.....