Delay in processing Montreal VO applications (2024)

[arun1995]

Sign this petition - https://chng.it/wnD7QpWSCm

 

[iSaidGoodDay]

Sign this petition - https://chng.it/wnD7QpWSCm

I'm sorry, but seeing Justin Trudeau on the list of decision makers made me laugh.

Also, if you want anyone to seriously consider this petition, you need to be technically right:
1. "Application Receipt Dates (AORs) in July 2024 from Montreal are still awaiting Final Decisions (FDs)." - this makes no sense as not everyone gets FD. You need to use the right technical term.
2. "Express Entry applicants (Federal Skilled Workers and Provincial Nominee Programs) transferred to the Montreal Visa Office are experiencing unprecedented delays" - what's the sample size that you got? List it there. Without it, it reads as if the petitioner has no idea of what they are talking about.
3. "This significant backlog is causing considerable hardship for applicants" - this is untrue for most of applicants. Unless family reunification is the issue, no significant hardships here.
4. You haven't addressed how you expect the govt to handle levels-plans and conflict of speedy processing of the candidates. Or, the fact that IRCC is likely going to be downsized (they were/are 65% overstaffed to provide faster processing). At a time where the integrity of the immigration system and how quickly they are performing background checks is being heavily scrutinized(for all the right reasons), this petition would be a conflict.

The petition should be a serious undertaking, this reads more bratty. I've worked with my local government for a while over different topics and I can assure you that this petition has no merit or seriousness behind it.

We follow a framework of:
1. collect data
2. carry out a research
3. show the evidence
4. demand action

Follow it to create a much more stronger petition.

 

[arun1995]

I'm sorry, but seeing Justin Trudeau on the list of decision makers made me laugh.

Also, if you want anyone to seriously consider this petition, you need to be technically right:
1. "Application Receipt Dates (AORs) in July 2024 from Montreal are still awaiting Final Decisions (FDs)." - this makes no sense as not everyone gets FD. You need to use the right technical term.
2. "Express Entry applicants (Federal Skilled Workers and Provincial Nominee Programs) transferred to the Montreal Visa Office are experiencing unprecedented delays" - what's the sample size that you got? List it there. Without it, it reads as if the petitioner has no idea of what they are talking about.
3. "This significant backlog is causing considerable hardship for applicants" - this is untrue for most of applicants. Unless family reunification is the issue, no significant hardships here.
4. You haven't addressed how you expect the govt to handle levels-plans and conflict of speedy processing of the candidates. Or, the fact that IRCC is likely going to be downsized (they were/are 65% overstaffed to provide faster processing). At a time where the integrity of the immigration system and how quickly they are performing background checks is being heavily scrutinized(for all the right reasons), this petition would be a conflict.

The petition should be a serious undertaking, this reads more bratty. I've worked with my local government for a while over different topics and I can assure you that this petition has no merit or seriousness behind it.

We follow a framework of:
1. collect data
2. carry out a research
3. show the evidence
4. demand action

Follow it to create a much more stronger petition.

Thanks. What you have mentioned makes sense to me. Closed the petition for now. Will create a new one based on your feedback.

 

[iSaidGoodDay]

Also, if you go through the ATIP notes discussion in this video - it shows how they account for level plans and issued ITAs:

 

[arun1995]

Montreal PVO awaiting FD WhatsApp group

https://chat.whatsapp.com/H5A3U4ZO6Dz8sPhqLtXYuL