Interviews entail an element of bias in favour of or against the interviewee as with job interviews. There has been high level of inconsistency in handling similar situations and circumstances.
Applicants skills in presenting their case may also differ. Some are excellent in convincing and presentation skills whereas some are weak and may score less because of personal characteristics...
Why can’t CIC assess applications on written original evidence and call for interviews only when necessary. This model proved successful across many European countries.
How do you agree or disagree with the above statements and is there anything that can be done to redress such inconsistency going forward?
Applicants skills in presenting their case may also differ. Some are excellent in convincing and presentation skills whereas some are weak and may score less because of personal characteristics...
Why can’t CIC assess applications on written original evidence and call for interviews only when necessary. This model proved successful across many European countries.
How do you agree or disagree with the above statements and is there anything that can be done to redress such inconsistency going forward?