B
CHC, Islamabad Spouse Sponsorship Timeline 2009 -2010
- Thread starter peacekeeper
- Start date
I agree with you 100% people might file an apeal or a law suit after being rejected and you may win it one day may be after 4 or 5 years. The big question is who wants to lose their first 5 years of married life? I say get everything done as soon as possible and get it over with the process. I have lived through this for 19 months and I know others who have lived through this torture for even longer and the wait is killer. People who just applied and think that this is an easy process to survive are mistaken! And not everyone can afford a $2000 lawyer, so most of the applicants apply by themselves. Here's a statement I copied from CIC website "You do not need to hire an immigration consultant. It is up to you. Your application will not be given special attention or guaranteed approval if you use a consultant."became-a-loner said:
Reference:
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/representative/index.asp
khan82 said:Ayesha sis i give you +1 ap ke Re-medical anay ke khushi mai
Aww you're a sweetheart! ;D
Tor-wi said:Ley lo yaar treat...visa dilwa do bus... :'( insHAllah something good will happen soon...I am really looking fwd to the rest of 2011 for a positive reply from CIC... :
InshAllah InshAllah- dont worry! *hug*
O Canada said:i know ayesha! its been 4 months and still havnt heard anything! I email them and they dont reply either! i had ordered CAIPS notes and everything is good too so i dont really know what the problem is
I hope you hear something soon...everyone is saying that if they dont respond to emails that means something is on the way! So keep the prayer mode on, InshAllah this month should bring lots of good news for all! =)
tkaa
Star Member
- Jul 25, 2011
- 0
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- islamabad
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- FEB 2010
- Doc's Request.
- 27TH APRIL 2011
- AOR Received.
- 28th june 2010
- File Transfer...
- 25TH MAY 2010
- Med's Request
- 12TH MAY 2011
- Med's Done....
- 23RD MAY 2011
- Passport Req..
- 10th sep 2011
- VISA ISSUED...
- 3rd october 2011
dear forum members, friends, well wishers. i have a great news to share with u all. got lucky today today.... just received my PPR.... i am so happy. cant thank u enough allah, maula, parents, family, friends and last but not the least my very loving and supporting husband....
With due respect to everyones views, I'd like to share something here. I feel high commissions of every country judge every case with alot of suspicion and doubt, because they've seen all types of cases. Sending proof is for our own satisfaction, as we're providing them with enough data to analyse how genuine our relationship is. The less the information, the less data there is to examine, which may or may not cause doubts in the minds of immigration officers.
Thinking of it rationally, if I was a visa officer I'd think couples who have/had been living together need to be reunited as they've already lived together as a family, in a setup- along with cases where the couple has a child/children. Whereas, Nikkah only cases are basically just paper marriage- even though according to country law, legally, religiously, morally, ethically, it is the Nikkah which is considered actual marriage, not the rukhsati. Rukhsati is just rasm-ana....It is the official giving away of the bride, by her parents. One can have their Nikkah, and not rukhsati on the basis that they are completing their education, working, or due to some other issue. If I was the visa officer, a nikkah only case wouldnt seem as 'urgent' as a case where the couple had been living together, or as a case where the woman has a newborn kid. I'd like to clarify here that by 'urgent' I dont mean judgement on basis of priority, but on basis of a couples togetherness and their living or have lived as a family in harmony. But if it is a Nikkah only case, it might come across as being not so imperative as the couple might have some unfinished tasks-and thus their file might not be looked at very seriously, or sometimes, with suspicion too. However, there have been Nikkah only cases in the past which have received visas, and those might have been on the basis of the proof provided. The couple could've known each other for a long time, and thus, establishing the relationship between them or their families could have been convincing.
As far as rukhsati for men is concerned, again, its obvious that no man gets rukhsati-o-fied. If he is the applicant, again, rukhsati cases seem more valid because both the guy and girl have lived together as a couple, making it more difficult for them when they are apart. Whereas, if its just a Nikkah and the girl returns to Canada, then to the couple the feeling is pretty much like being engaged as they dont know what living together feels like- and that is what CHC is looking at. When the sponsor doesnt visit the applicant for a long duration, even then their case is looked at with suspicion-as anyone, who has lived with their better half would obviously want to see them more often, or talk to them frequently. Hence, the 'additional information' such as call logs, skype logs, tickets and boarding passes along with photographs.
Thinking of it rationally, if I was a visa officer I'd think couples who have/had been living together need to be reunited as they've already lived together as a family, in a setup- along with cases where the couple has a child/children. Whereas, Nikkah only cases are basically just paper marriage- even though according to country law, legally, religiously, morally, ethically, it is the Nikkah which is considered actual marriage, not the rukhsati. Rukhsati is just rasm-ana....It is the official giving away of the bride, by her parents. One can have their Nikkah, and not rukhsati on the basis that they are completing their education, working, or due to some other issue. If I was the visa officer, a nikkah only case wouldnt seem as 'urgent' as a case where the couple had been living together, or as a case where the woman has a newborn kid. I'd like to clarify here that by 'urgent' I dont mean judgement on basis of priority, but on basis of a couples togetherness and their living or have lived as a family in harmony. But if it is a Nikkah only case, it might come across as being not so imperative as the couple might have some unfinished tasks-and thus their file might not be looked at very seriously, or sometimes, with suspicion too. However, there have been Nikkah only cases in the past which have received visas, and those might have been on the basis of the proof provided. The couple could've known each other for a long time, and thus, establishing the relationship between them or their families could have been convincing.
As far as rukhsati for men is concerned, again, its obvious that no man gets rukhsati-o-fied. If he is the applicant, again, rukhsati cases seem more valid because both the guy and girl have lived together as a couple, making it more difficult for them when they are apart. Whereas, if its just a Nikkah and the girl returns to Canada, then to the couple the feeling is pretty much like being engaged as they dont know what living together feels like- and that is what CHC is looking at. When the sponsor doesnt visit the applicant for a long duration, even then their case is looked at with suspicion-as anyone, who has lived with their better half would obviously want to see them more often, or talk to them frequently. Hence, the 'additional information' such as call logs, skype logs, tickets and boarding passes along with photographs.
tkaa
Star Member
- Jul 25, 2011
- 0
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- islamabad
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- FEB 2010
- Doc's Request.
- 27TH APRIL 2011
- AOR Received.
- 28th june 2010
- File Transfer...
- 25TH MAY 2010
- Med's Request
- 12TH MAY 2011
- Med's Done....
- 23RD MAY 2011
- Passport Req..
- 10th sep 2011
- VISA ISSUED...
- 3rd october 2011
tkaa
Star Member
- Jul 25, 2011
- 0
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- islamabad
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- FEB 2010
- Doc's Request.
- 27TH APRIL 2011
- AOR Received.
- 28th june 2010
- File Transfer...
- 25TH MAY 2010
- Med's Request
- 12TH MAY 2011
- Med's Done....
- 23RD MAY 2011
- Passport Req..
- 10th sep 2011
- VISA ISSUED...
- 3rd october 2011
tkaa
Star Member
- Jul 25, 2011
- 0
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- islamabad
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- FEB 2010
- Doc's Request.
- 27TH APRIL 2011
- AOR Received.
- 28th june 2010
- File Transfer...
- 25TH MAY 2010
- Med's Request
- 12TH MAY 2011
- Med's Done....
- 23RD MAY 2011
- Passport Req..
- 10th sep 2011
- VISA ISSUED...
- 3rd october 2011