I concur in what
@armoured has offered here and what
@primaprime offered in the other topic where you posed the same query.
I do not concur in efforts to manufacture evidence, even accurate evidence.
With rare exceptions, PRs do not run into problems with the PR Residency Obligation, or with applications for citizenship, UNLESS there is cause. Neither IRCC nor CBSA engage in
gotcha-games.
PRs who comply with the rules and who play it straight have very little or nothing to worry about.
Sure, those who are
cutting-it-close can encounter some non-routine processing and elevated scrutiny, but their best insurance is to maintain a decent margin over the minimums, keep good records, and be honest, accurate, and complete when engaging with CBSA or IRCC. Not that complicated.
Note, in particular, that
@primaprime is right that the CBSA travel history record of the entry will be correct. But now there may be a note added for emphasis since demanding the stamp in your passport, your effort to manufacture evidence, might have raised a red flag.
I do not mean to suggest that this instance is a big deal. Probably no big deal at all. But the approach you employed, the effort to manufacture evidence, risks more than what can be gained. Other than the actual facts, the impression Canadian officials have regarding YOUR CREDIBILITY is the biggest factor influencing how things go . . . in regards to RO compliance or qualifying for a grant of citizenship. If your behavior signals game-playing that risks inviting suspicions.