+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
nursemich said:
I received this email today and I am shaking!!!!
:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Dear xxxxxxx,


We have on xxxxxx sent you by mail a request for the original copies of NBI clearances, Right of Permanent Resident fees and medical examination for you and your spouse. Please comply with the request promptly.


Once we receive satisfactory medical results for you and your spouse and have no further concerns in the other statutory requirements, we will be in the position to finalise your application. Unfortunately, we are unable to provide you a specific date for the finalization of your application. We would appreciate your understanding while you wait to hear more from our office.


Federal Skilled Workers Unit
Embassy of Canada, Manila


So happy for you nursmich :D..... so happy too with the way things go with Manila VO ;)......
 
Out of interest, Nursemich, what does your ECAS status currently say? Just IN PROCESS -> We received your application on XXX?

Wayne.
 
Cappuccino said:
Hmm. Why I wonder would they send medical requests if they had not already satisifed themselves that everything else was in order? Pretty pricey for an applicant to have to do medical requests at £300 per person only to have their application fail due to something visa office could find out prior to sending the requests?

I don't remember ever reading a single case where someone was rejected after medical requests for any other reason BUT excessive strain due to medicals.

So IMO visa office have already satisfied themselves prior to issuing medical requests. I admit that's just my opinion though.

Wayne.
You are right. They would have done the VO review before the Medical request was sent. The fact that the process is faster in Manilla does not mean the review is not done but clearly the letter mentions meeting statutory requirements. Some people will still be interviewed after the PER but most won't. As long as your submission is clear and straight forward, the process will be as fast as Nursemich's. It is not in all cases they call your offices/ bank etc to verify your submitted documents. They will only do this if they have doubts about authenticity.
 
dear friends , regardin th E and B file numbers I think all of us both B and E nubmers B refers to the overal status of immigration while E i for the nubmer of those who applied after June 2010.in the PER they mention the E nubmer as far as I have acknowledged.
 
beaanddrei said:
So happy for you nursmich :D..... so happy too with the way things go with Manila VO ;)......


wow - that was fast!!!! Now i'm shaking too :) Congratulations and all the best for you and your family!!!
 
Hi, My friend has received NER after the encashment.

Rgds,
Raj.

genius77 said:
hi,

im sorry about the application was declined... my question right now if the application fee was already encashed??? or you received the NER before the encashment??? please let us know.. thanks
 
ntaye said:
Dear All;
My application status in ECAS goes from In Process to Centralized Intake Office Sydney (CIO-S) - Eligibility Review Complete.Any suggestion or any one who has seen the same status please?

Mr. Woyne please update my status on spread sheet.

My status says the same too :)....so i guess v have to wait till they intimate us regarding the results of the review :)
 
Thank you for all the greetings.. I hope yours will come soon too :)

Can you help me find a link on how to prepare for the medical exam?
I am already aware of chest xray to check for PTB, Blood test for Hep B, Urine Test for infections..

What else?
Cholesterol level?
Liver Enzymes?
Cardiac Enzymes?

So I would know what to avoid and what to take. Also, I'd like to take a pre medicals in a local facility asap to correct what I can :)
 
Dear Indira,

I am November 2010 applicant. Earlier my E-cas status was 'in process', but now it shows as 'Document Received'

btw congrats to Nursemich, this gives us so much relief,

Congrats to other PER receivers of the week.

Regards,

Maplecan



indira_prab said:
Hello SatishMan,

I'm not sure about this ??? ??? Sorry.

But i think it makes sense to skip the VO eligibility review stage as it's already done by CIO.

IN PROCESS usually means the background checks/documentation checks are on as of applications received until June 25 2010. For post June 26 apps, No idea :-[ :-[ :-[.

The irony is this status is available for people without a PER also. So, i'm very confused :-\ :-\ :-\

Thanks,

Indira Prabhakaran.
 
Thanks for your advise Wayne. Will provide you details soon which you have asked for.
Rgds,
Raj.

Cappuccino said:
Hi, I am sorry to hear about your friend's rejection. It is very difficult to comment since I know nothing of the NOC occupation under which your friend applied.

Regrettably it is very difficult to oppose the decision of an eligibility review unless CIO are found to have made a genuine error.

The best thing your friend can do IMO is to write a letter stating exactly how his duties match those of the NOC, and exactly which part of his documentary evidence supports this. My understanding is that they usually expect an applicant to have experience in at least 50% of the duties on the list, although they describe it in the operation manual as a "substantial amount of duties" without actually stating what that amount is, therefore leaving a certain amount of discretion with the CIO immigration officer.

Can I please ask how many points did your friend have, and also what were his/her IELTS results like? I think if someone is borderline with regards the duties they perform compared with the NOC description, they may look at the strength of the application as a whole before determining whether to use discretion to pass or fail an application.

Anyway, as I said if your friend feels that CIO are genuinely in error here then send a letter detailing exactly how his duties match the NOC duties. Nothing to lose really. Otherwise the only option I believe is a formal appeal which can take 12 months or more, with no guarantee of success.

Wayne.
 
victor.shareen said:
HI Anil,
Can you update my info in your spreadsheet
Name: Shareen
City: Bangalore
NOC: 1122
Appln Received: 22/09/2010
DD Cashed: 06/10/2010
PER Received: 25/01/2011
PCC: sent with application
Thanks,
Shareen

Congrats Shareen :)

Thanks,

Indira Prabhakaran.
 
Hi everyone I am new to this forum!!!! following this forum since few months and i belief it is very helpful for people like us who are about to file their case for canadian immigration....


Dr Zuhaib.....
 
indira_prab said:
Congrats Shareen :)

Thanks,

Indira Prabhakaran.

Thanks Indira....My E-cas status said "in process" a week back...and today whn i checked it said CIO-S eligibility review complete....But this happened almost after 3 weeks after i received my1st PER....So that means that my application was accepted right ????
 
HI,
Can anyone update my info in spreadsheet
Name: Zuhaib Uddin
VO: London
NOC: 3113
Appln Received: 18/01/2011
DD Cashed: ............
PER Received: waiting........
PCC: not yet
Thanks,
Zuhaib
 
it is very strange. I received PER yesterday and the ecas at that time showed in process today Ecas is saying application received ...and when you look at the status it says your application was received on xxxxxxx. does any one else have the same situation?