Dr.Hasib said:Dear pun123,
I second your notion...+1 from me
Thanks it make my neg by 50%. Now I am 14/-7


Dr.Hasib said:Dear pun123,
I second your notion...+1 from me
EnvioZA said:Dear sasi6174 ,
You are right that we submitted all the DOCs.
The difference is that CIO can check completness at a glance by looking at all your docs, which they had to by VO in 2 to 3 steps. It must help them to minus uncomplete applications quickly. Which will in turn remove backlog and make process faster. Therefore once your application is passed by CIO you are almost through.
Now, What will be the job for VO ?? I guess they have their share too.
I just hope, VO will take less time to do whatever they are there to do. But we have to see how less time they really take.
-zahed
Yes I also think it's better way to handle.Cappuccino said:I think also by requiring the full documents the actual intake at CIO is vastly reduced. Reputedly they had many applications under the pre-June-26 "fast track" system that actually withdrew their application once they were given 120 days to provide supporting evidence.
I think it's better this way since CIO's time isn't wasted by people without adequate experience or with insufficient funds etc.
Wayne.
crissy225 said:hello friends! anyone here who used credit card as payment? concerning the fee payment form, section b credit card payment authorization,did you place the date at the bottom right corner of the form? i'm confused, coz it says in the authorization number, for official use only, i don't know if the date there is for them,too.
Cappuccino said:I think also by requiring the full documents the actual intake at CIO is vastly reduced. Reputedly they had many applications under the pre-June-26 "fast track" system that actually withdrew their application once they were given 120 days to provide supporting evidence.
I think it's better this way since CIO's time isn't wasted by people without adequate experience or with insufficient funds etc.
Wayne.
Cappuccino said:Hi guys,
I updated the Projections tab of our spreadsheet:
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AiJy8Qu8lcQbdGxiSnNhME5sVi1uRlZtUWNhOEFwemc&hl=ar&authkey=CLDXsFA#gid=6
Currently looking at 8396 completed applications by 30 June 2011
Wayne.
Cam1234 said:Hi Wayne:
Just curious, after updating, did you have to increase or decrease your previous projections?
Thanks,
Cam
mayankpandya said:Dear All,
How much low score in Ielts affect case .
If some one only requires cover only 7 points to reach magic figure 67 via IELTS ?
So what if he gets 8 points via IELTS with Avg of 6 Band ? Does it effect Case ?
what are the chances of rejection boz of low score in IELTS ?
Please let me know.
Regards,
Mayank
canady said:I am with you guys that they are unintentionally miss-leading us by their instructions & actions but the word FINAL is a very attractive word![]()
In a previous post, I expected the total number of applicants to eventually reach 8800 (I would say +/- 5%, so between 8400 and 9200). I see the estimations converging this range. Once the registered nurses NOC is filled up (maybe within one month), the pace of growth will cool down.Cappuccino said:Hi, the previous projection was around 8055, so it's gone up.
I've just added a projection history, on the right hand side, so we can see the history if each update and watches as it goes up or down.
Wayne.
asaif said:In a previous post, I expected the total number of applicants to eventually reach 8800 (I would say +/- 5%, so between 8400 and 9200). I see the estimations converging this range. Once the registered nurses NOC is filled up (maybe within one month), the pace of growth will cool down.
asaif said:In a previous post, I expected the total number of applicants to eventually reach 8800 (I would say +/- 5%, so between 8400 and 9200). I see the estimations converging this range. Once the registered nurses NOC is filled up (maybe within one month), the pace of growth will cool down.
Cappuccino said:P.S. Cool I just made my 800th post!Wonder if I get an extra star at 1000?