Hi,
johnyoung1984 said:
By the way, it has been one more year since I submitted my application. So should I count the total hours until now or just give them the total hours one year ago?
NeverGiveUp said:
You can count the total working hours until now. They must consider any updated documents before the final assessment (e.g. updated work reference letter, IELTS score...) I'm pretty sure that some forum members were awarded additional points for updated work experience and IELTS score. If you got a master degree in Canada (at least two years), you should have been awarded these points... (you'll be awarded these points at final assessment if you have provided them with enough proofs)
NeverGiveUp is right---by law, they should award you points for any experience that occurred after the application but before the assessment. This is stated in the OP 6B (Chapter 9.12, "Experience"),
Officers must:
(...)
- take into account any years of experience that occur between application and assessment, and for which the applicant has submitted the necessary documentation (R77);
In my case, however, they accepted the updated description of my lead statement and duties, but counted the experience
only up to the date of application. But hopefully, you have enough points without relying on extra experience anyways?
johnyoung1984 said:
I am so disappointed. I get a master degree here in Canada, and my wife also has a college diploma in China. But they didn't give any point for adaptability. This is just so unfair and irresponsible.
Apparently they mistakenly did not give you adaptability points. Did you complete your M.Sc. and submit a proof of degree with the application? If yes, definitely state this fact in your email to CPP-Ottawa. By the way, I recommend you sending the email rather than the paper mail---it is faster and you will have a proof of your communication with CIC. One of the forum members, aidina, was able to appeal his rejection by sending to CPP-Ottawa a screenshot of his earlier email to them.
A.jenab said:
I was told it would be possible; two of my colleagues were able to get their PER after 4 semesters (They were in Canada less than a month before starting their PhD). Also, last fall our university organized a meeting with an officer and the guy clearly mentioned that it is possible to apply. I wasn't there but those two friends I mentioned were and applied immediately. So, I took my chance... plus I can resubmit the whole application after being returned. No harm done yet
It might be that they are changing the interpretation of the rules. You never know what *rules* are going to be in effect when you apply even though the *law* does not change. Adaptability points is one of such examples---those who applied prior to June 2010 got +5 for 2 years of study in Canada, while present applicants are rejected for lack of the same. With these two years vs. four semesters issue, my school's immigration lawyer was telling everyone that it is 2
academic (not calendar) years, and I believed that until several people from this forum got their applications returned. This might have been changed again, or albaik was just lucky.
I think you didn't risk anything by applying early, except the postage, which is nothing compared to the application-related expenses. I guess we will know when you hear from CIO and CPP. In the meantime, good luck!
smallkick said:
Update my status, finally got the passport and PR visa back today. I am planning to complete landing this weekend.
Good luck everyone on this forum. Thanks.
Congratulations smallkick!
