+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
Client Portal

A11.2 Met and Eligibility : Not Started

P

Ps_vp

Star Member
Jun 10, 2016
101
9
We are trying to interpret the GCMS notes of my Friend with AOR 01/04/2017

As per notes medical and criminality is passed. Eligibility : Not Started

On 13/07/2017 the Agent reviewed A11.2 and marked as MET with details to back his decision.
Also on 13/07/2017 under one of the eligibility sub section the same agent updated Eligibity new value to : MET.
On 14/07/2017 the file transferred to NDVO and the reason : Work Load Redistribution and on same date there is another Eligibity sub section which mention Old Value : Met , New Value : Not Started. This was updated by a different agent at CIO Sydney.

What you guys think the scenario is as per the notes?
 
Last edited:
Ps_vp said:
We are trying to interpret the GCMS notes of my Friend with AOR 01/04/2017

As per notes medical and criminality is passed. Eligibility : Not Started

On 13/07/2017 the Agent reviewed A11.2 and marked as MET with details to back his decision.
Also on 13/07/2017 under one of the eligibility sub section the same agent updated Eligibity new value to : MET.
On 14/07/2017 the file transferred to NDVO and the reason : Work Load Redistribution and on same date there is another Eligibity sub section which mention Old Value : Met , New Value : Not Started. This was updated by a different agent at CIO Sydney.

What you guys think the scenario is as per the notes?
Click to expand...
On 13/07/2017, did the agent say Appears Met or Met?
 
  • Like
Reactions: anisharjun
doge said:
On 13/07/2017, did the agent say Appears Met or Met?
Click to expand...
Under section Agent Review A11.2 notes mention as MET. Underneath that section Where the Agent Give his review Notes it Mention "Appear Met"
 
Last edited:
Ps_vp said:
Under section Agent Review A11.2 notes mention as MET. Underneath that section Where the Agent Give his review Notes it Mention "Appear Met"
Click to expand...
You can refer to one of my post here:
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-im...c-process-according-to-the-gcms-notes.507656/

I believe that you just passed Case Analyst Review and the next step would be Officer review. Case Analyst will give a recommendation on your A11.2 & eligibility. It is the officer who makes the final decision of your A11.2 & eligibility.

This is definitely a good sign. You should get your PPR soon after the officer review.
 
Ps_vp said:
We are trying to interpret the GCMS notes of my Friend with AOR 01/04/2017

As per notes medical and criminality is passed. Eligibility : Not Started

On 13/07/2017 the Agent reviewed A11.2 and marked as MET with details to back his decision.
Also on 13/07/2017 under one of the eligibility sub section the same agent updated Eligibity new value to : MET.
On 14/07/2017 the file transferred to NDVO and the reason : Work Load Redistribution and on same date there is another Eligibity sub section which mention Old Value : Met , New Value : Not Started. This was updated by a different agent at CIO Sydney.

What you guys think the scenario is as per the notes?
Click to expand...
Hey I got the same status with eligibility. have you ordered gcms notes after your IP2 started?
 
I got an rprf request on the 15 of feb,it’s been a month now and I called ircc today what they said is that the background check is in progress .and that eligibility is not over. It’s being processed at CPC OTTAWA. my drought is why would they ask for rprf before eligibility pass.time line is on my signature.
 
doge said:
You can refer to one of my post here:
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-im...c-process-according-to-the-gcms-notes.507656/

I believe that you just passed Case Analyst Review and the next step would be Officer review. Case Analyst will give a recommendation on your A11.2 & eligibility. It is the officer who makes the final decision of your A11.2 & eligibility.

This is definitely a good sign. You should get your PPR soon after the officer review.
Click to expand...
Hello friend
I received my gcms notes today and case analyst has mentioned Recommendation: review required and for A11.2 and Canadian experience he has mentioned Appears Met.
This all happened in August, after that no one has touched my file.

Does this means only officer recommendation is pending for final decision? And that is only taking time

Thanks in advance. Your post really helped.
 
AUserS said:
Hello friend
I received my gcms notes today and case analyst has mentioned Recommendation: review required and for A11.2 and Canadian experience he has mentioned Appears Met.
This all happened in August, after that no one has touched my file.

Does this means only officer recommendation is pending for final decision? And that is only taking time

Thanks in advance. Your post really helped.
Click to expand...
Review Required means that there is something in your profile that concerns him. It’s not necessarily bad, but depending on what exactly he doesn’t like, it might lead to rejection.

Can you post the entire text of the Eligibility assessment?
 
zabrodov said:
Review Required means that there is something in your profile that concerns him. It’s not necessarily bad, but depending on what exactly he doesn’t like, it might lead to rejection.

Can you post the entire text of the Eligibility assessment?
Click to expand...
RECOMMENDATION: Review Required MI3 SUMMARY NOTES: CIO RECOMMENDATION: REVIEW REQUIRED- PENDING OUTSTANDING PC FOR PA RCMP FINGERPRINTS RECEIVED FOR PA & SPOUSE EDOC 31***79
NRT RECOMMENDATION: PASS CRIMINALITY FOR SPOUSE PA & SPOUSE EXEMPT FROM DOING
BIOMETRICS BASED ON THE PUBLIC POLICY A11.2: Appears Met R87.1: CEC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Appears Met Ready to Finalize RPRF: Complete
 
zabrodov said:
Review Required means that there is something in your profile that concerns him. It’s not necessarily bad, but depending on what exactly he doesn’t like, it might lead to rejection.

Can you post the entire text of the Eligibility assessment?
Click to expand...

I have read somewhere that officers sometime deliberately put review required status. With that they need not to follow any timelines. Can this be true?
Thanks in advance
 
AUserS said:
RECOMMENDATION: Review Required MI3 SUMMARY NOTES: CIO RECOMMENDATION: REVIEW REQUIRED- PENDING OUTSTANDING PC FOR PA RCMP FINGERPRINTS RECEIVED FOR PA & SPOUSE EDOC 31***79
NRT RECOMMENDATION: PASS CRIMINALITY FOR SPOUSE PA & SPOUSE EXEMPT FROM DOING
BIOMETRICS BASED ON THE PUBLIC POLICY A11.2: Appears Met R87.1: CEC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Appears Met Ready to Finalize RPRF: Complete
Click to expand...

Hey, any update on your case? I've received my notes today and it says the same thing.
 
mfsbf_87 said:
I see. Let's hope to hear good news soon.
Click to expand...
Hey, I am sure you both would have got your PR now, can you let me know how much time it took to get through with the PR process?
Secondly can you let me know your Visa Office and stream?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.