Search results

Good job!

I thought they wanted to create less disturbance so they went for interviews

There was this mention of the scientist dismissing concerns about the safety of fish in the leftover water;however, there was no mention of a public outcry or criticism. So I would think Not Given is what it is. Although I took it to be false if i apply my bias there.

you're right! I think I also wrote Not given .am not sure though.

Reading Section 4- Public Subsidies conserving water did Mr M suggest finding alternate? - False politicians was there criticism of using fish to test leftover water - FALSE

Bridge ?(Section 1 question 6, where should he get off for the trail) tickets could be used at "certain times" (Section 2) Willows specialized in one product (cupboards) the owner read an article by the head of research department inspect the accounts (research methodology) less disturbance...