Search results
-
P
PFL - MISREPRESENTATION - NOT MENTIONING COMMON LAW
We We have provided all the required proofs Joint lease agreement Pictures together ID proofs showing same addresses Financial transactions Tax returns showing the relationship as common law Pregnancy proof as I am current pregnant Joint bank account etc.- priyabhee
- Post #7
- Forum: Canadian Experience Class
-
P
PFL - MISREPRESENTATION - NOT MENTIONING COMMON LAW
All proofs are provided there is no issue with it and genuinely we both are in common law. We just missed the timeline because I am pregnant and it’s is a high risk. So just missed it and later sent webform with all supporting documents- priyabhee
- Post #6
- Forum: Canadian Experience Class
-
P
PFL - MISREPRESENTATION - NOT MENTIONING COMMON LAW
Yes I agree. However though civil status changed before submitting PR. We recognized that we missed the timeline and sent a webform already informing that 1 year status is completed and want to include the partners information as well. There was no request from officer, we proactively submitted...- priyabhee
- Post #3
- Forum: Canadian Experience Class
-
P
PFL - MISREPRESENTATION - NOT MENTIONING COMMON LAW
Hello experts, I really need a quick guidance on my situation. I applied for express entry profile in September 2024 and got an invitation in September 2024, I submitted my PR application on November 14th, 2024. I am in common law relationship since November 1st, 2023 to present. When I got...- priyabhee
- Thread
- Replies: 15
- Forum: Canadian Experience Class