Search results

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker My local office was ST.Clair , oath scheduled in Sboro

Re: @ St Clair-RQ-Preliminary review completed, referred to level 2 decision maker Guys, After 32 mnths, pink envelope. I never posted anything, followed and posted on St.Clair RQ forum for a while, becaise never sent a fresh ATIP to see the level 2 thing. Timeline Applied first : may...

-------- I have return from Lawyer to check the possibility of mandamus the lawyer have taken small amounts for initial consultant and than send me back with the word patient ------------ Did the lawyer refuse to file for mandamus? That's strange?

Congragulations!! 39 months seems to be (unfortunately) the norm lately...They wait for the exact 36 months , and then knuckle down to work...

My buddy received the new "additional RQ" back in December on his 37th month, which he immediately completed. Today he received oath letter. How I want to interpret this is: CIC would take your (third, including original) final statement, supported by other docs, to decisionize without the need...

applying separately is one of the triggers for a potential RQ

Re : Article in Canadian Star I wrote a letter to the editor, applauding him and the author for a article that addresses a serious problem. I would recommend alol to do the same, they should know thst we read it, and appreciated it.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Avwv2JB05vdtdGQ1eWZHenJncjE5dnZHak1MRVkxd2c&usp=drive_web#gid=2 Tried to access the database since some while ago: maybe it's my excel skills, but most of it is gone, numbers on the left show 5-10-19-26 etc...like its filtering with something (...

Two of my friends, both rq'ed back in the summer of 2012 got their oath invitations for this week. From application to oath: 37 and 38 months. There seems to be an effort to clear up files before getting past 36 months. But not enough effort for a faster processing, unfortunately. I am on my...

re: "Some people mentioned ordering ATIP can help move your case forward by showing they you are concerned and watching" : I know at least a case where it helped a friend who got rq'ed in 2012 then somehow wasn't invited to test like most of us were in Jan-Feb 2014. He requested ATIP in May...

bravepeople, big congrats, and even bigger thanks for your excellent support to all of us here...all the best

+++ for feb testakers party!!

Ronin, congrats. One down, 30,000 to go:)

powerpc, congragulations, and than you for the detailed summary. Albeit slower, those Feb takers are slowly moving ahead!!

bravepeople, thank you for taking the effort to do this. May this week bring lotsa oath invitations to all:)

Withdrawing an application is a strong trigger for RQ on a subsequent application. But you will get citizenship 100%, at the end of a (max) 36 months from now if you reapply. As opposed to 50-60% (who knows, just guessing) in another 12 months from now if you stay. Tough call, indeed. I'd wait...

I have a co-worker friend with exact same timelines, from St.Clair Office. Applied in fall 2012, RQ last summer, wrote exam same day Feb 12 ( that's how we found out !). He received his oath letter for June 12 at Scarborough yesterday. Now that's hopeful for us :)

It seems that the recent oath letters ( with exam in March) are mostly from Mississauga office. Those of us at St.Clair are not treated with the same speed, I guess the file / judge ratio for RQ'ed applicants is higher. But things will move eventually, CIC should be aware of that.

With all due respect to fellow RQ'ers agony, I have difficulty connecting with "cannot travel" complaints. Unless one neglects to properly apply for PR renewal, we are free to travel. You need to let cic know ( I believe 2 weeks in advance) about travel arrangements, so they won't book...

I believe ATIP will help dormant cases speed up, especially towards the end of the infamous 36 months term. Othervise for regular (albeit slowly moving) files, it may not.