Search results

Okay...we'll see.

No, the only thing it proves beyond any reasonable doubt is that neither he nor you have any idea what you're saying. And when he gets another letter soon saying "we made a mistake, please disregard the request", then you'll see who was right and who was wrong.

Before you try your lame little insults on me, go back and read your original post. Did you mention that it was ONLY your educational documents? No, you didn't. You're more than welcome to continue ignoring me, but don't be all shocked and sad when you discover that they made a mistake...

It has nothing to do with defeat. The whole thing looks like a mistake, because it doesn't make any sense. Why would they return all of his original forms that he filled out? I've never heard of that happening to anybody before. And also, why would they ask for additional information on the...

Such a case would have absolutely nothing to do with the Canadian constitution. I already said - in an earlier post - that BUSINESS dealings can certainly be taken to court, but don't expect to win your case by claiming Canadian charter protections. The case wasn't based SOLELY on Canadian...

How is that even REMOTELY similar? It's a completely different case, with a completely different set of parameters and circumstances. Vodafone is a company that's already operating INSIDE India. They've been doing business there for YEARS. The CIC litigants, meanwhile, have absolutely no...

If the example in the article was not sufficient to fall under the charter, then believe me when I say that the CIC lawsuit is even MORE unlikely to fall under the charter. The only thing the CIC lawsuit has is people who sent in an application. That's it - nothing more. And the two men in...

If you received a refund, why do you want to give the cheque back to CIC...?

If you read the article, it gives an example on page 18 where two men were at one time LIVING in Canada (one of them for several years), and the court determined that it was STILL not enough to claim charter rights. So that whole article pretty much backs up what I've been saying all along -...

There's nothing to fight about with CIC at the moment. The only thing people can do is wait for the outcome of the case.

You can't use the word "know" until after the event has transpired and you've seen the final result. Anything before the final result is an assumption: - the bullet might miss completely - the storm could change direction before it reaches you - the rock could land on a roof and never make it...

No, it's only stupid when people try to reinvent the meaning of a word or when they don't understand how to use it properly. If you take a rock and throw it up in the air, are you stupid to ASSUME that it will slow down and start falling back to earth? If you see a rain storm approaching, are...

...are we really going to get into this ridiculous discussion again? Do you honestly believe that CIC did this for the few lousy pennies that it generated for them? And yes, in terms of Canada's overall government revenues, it was nothing more than pennies.

Oh you're absolutely right - you can take anyone to court, and spend as much of your hard-earned money as you like. The lawyers will be more than happy to get you into whatever court you want. It's not "illegal" until the Supreme Court of Canada says it is. And believe me when I tell you...

You're trying to argue legal issues with VERY simplistic examples that don't fit. If you "have a conflict"... What's the nature of the conflict? If you and a Canadian citizen are speaking on the phone, and he calls you a moron and hangs up on you, that's a conflict - but it's not something...

So what? I never said anything to the contrary. My argument has always been that people OUTSIDE of Canada shouldn't expect to fall under CANADA'S constitution.

That's a very different matter and, yes, for most things, a person inside Canada is protected by the Canadian constitution.

No...not at all. What I was saying is that it's completely impossible to predict human stupidity of the future. Back when Canada's constitution was written, they probably assumed that logic and common sense would rule human nature more often than not, and so they never envisioned a day when...

If they require an interview, they will tell you exactly what date and what location it will be.

The interview location will be your visa office location. So if your visa office was Singapore (there's no visa office in Bangladesh), then you'll have to go there for an interview if they request one. CIC will not change interview locations just because you moved. If they did that as a...