They send you an email stating that under such and such provision, they are allowed an extra thirty days. I don't know about whether complaints work - I take it on faith we should do them anyway.
There are sometimes delays. They're supposed to notify you, with maximum 30 additional days. Doesn't always happen. You can complain to the privacy ombudsman.
Yes, it is normal. You'll get the invitation - as the notification with detailed email says, I believe, at least six days beforehand.
(Rhetorical: you got the update on the web on Friday the 19th. It's now Sunday the 21st. Do people no longer think there are weekends? Couldn't you search first...
My logic is this: if they consider or believe that your situation constitutes those for which a YES is required, they may also consider it a misrepresentation to not answer yes. So I think it is safer to answer yes with an explanation.
Now legally if you disclose in the letter of explanation...
In this context, those who must fill out the form are your immediate family members (spouse, children). You mention your parents when you complete your form, but your parents adult siblings etc do not need to complete (assuming you're not trying to include them).
*Note that if your spouse is...
Since they have already applied for PR as family class/outland, they are either married or have already demonstrated what's needed. So this is mostly overkill in this context - at least until determined for what exactly the evidence of joint residency is needed. Figuring out how to prove it...
Just apply for the visa and follow the instructions. I'd forget about the 'dual intent' stuff - won't help you in applying (in my opinion) - it may be useful as a term at some legal stage but you'll want to avoid getting there..
You'll disclose during this that you have a sponsor ship...
I would still apply outland, which is (IMO) the important part of what @canuck78 wrote. If you want to get specific reassurance or discuss whether you would be better to leave, you should probably consult with a lawyer.
My answer is that I think you would be best to answer yes to both, and explain circumstances in a separate letter of explanation (eg not ordered to leave but asked to leave after extension refused).
I do not understand your question about family.
-Does she need a visa to Canada or is she from a country that is visa waiver (eg only needs ETA or US passport holder)?
-I don't know what you mean by 'go ahead with dual intent.' If she needs a visa, it is a 'normal temporary resident visa' (i.e. tourist or visitor visa - all are considered...
Apart from the foreign divorce issue, IRCC can and occasionally does evaluate on basis that you did not reside in Canada at all after becoming a PR. Sometimes this is phrased as the accompanying issue (who-accompanied-whom also referred to although less commonly now), because can be looked at...
2. Not significantly in most cases, but at least avoids delays on these two points that occur for some applicants. (Just note, you may not see the test/language requirements show as 'passed' in the tracker until the end - it doesn't mean they've forgotten these).
3. Not likely, it won't take...
You go through the main Treasury Board portal and specify cbsa at the appropriate stage.
https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/access-information-privacy/access-information/request-information.html
I find most of it reasonably self-explanatory, the two things to be clear...
I don't know what's going on, but if they cannot find it, it does not seem to be in their system, and I don't see why you would not just reapply again.
Note the previous receipt etc should still function.
In that case, reasonably straightforward.
Note though: just bank statements would be thin evidence of residing together. I'd suggest you go through the sponsorship application and see the evidence suggested as proofs of having resided together long enough for common law. You should provide as...
1. You miss the point. To clarify, again: it for the most part does not matter in this case whether your opinion (or my opinion, or Bob the Builder's) about how the officer will evaluate the case is correct or not. The question is whether that information about your or my opinion (correct or...