Did the lawyer tell you what you do need?
Again, simple deduction: if you can't get on the plane (you need to clarify this), then you need something for that - and if you can't apply for an ETA, you need a TRV.
No, I don't know number for CBSA, apart from internet.
It could be the part 'we might not understand' is that Vancouver seems to do the BG/prohibitions for all.
https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/march-2025-citizenship-applications.867956/post-11059935
I understand IRCC eventually provides the correspondence needed to let you apply for the PCC in [country.] Don't follow specifically for Singapore though.
They do not change it from outland to inland - just the landing process. I doubt they change the COPR#, but that's internal to them.
Note though - the 'virtual' landing process in Canada and changing it to the internal landing process might be considerably longer than waiting and getting it...
Try using the IRCC contact address listed in this one, and make it clear it is a complaint that you have not received in the 30 days NOR a notification of extension.
https://www.tbs-sct.canada.ca/ap/atip-aiprp/coord-eng.asp#I
Note though: it's quite likely you'll only get an extension notice...
I do not know if an ETA in the *old* passport would still be considered valid, as is the case with a TRV (where they say you can bring the old and new and the visa in old passport will be considered valid). It basically boils down to whether the airline will let you board - which SHOULD be...
Perfectly normal, unfortunately - background checks can be highly variable in terms of time. But applying October, nothing out of ordinary until about 12 months have passed.
GCMS notes delayed: it happens, you can complain. Info here...
Back to the thread topic: more typically confused approach from IRCC.
I have no problem with them not allowing the points for this - although it's not clear that there's any particular advantage for IRCC in doing so (granted, arguable) - particularly if policy goal is to reduce number of...
TRV is a temporary resident visa, not a tourist visa - although it does cover 'tourists' as well, that's not the only type of 'temporary resident' it covers. With a work permit, you're a temporary resident.
I don't think this 'not started / no officer assigned' to it is that meaningful. Just like it being 'stuck' in Vancouver.
Unfortunately it leaves very little info to distinguish what's (actually) happening, but I believe it's always been a bit of a black box (I think before it both took much...
My own guess is that no, I do not think so.
But: you haven't clarified whether you are using any days from your pre-PR time in Canada. That might be relevant, and if so, perhaps a short LOE (just say you applied for the extension/work permit/whatever but PR was approved and received before the...