Certainly provided what was requested by the documents/forms etc.
Applied with a cover letter and explanation providing additional details such as Entry and Exits from the US since we visit there often, and Stamps from Europe, in case the officer feels like they want to check.
For clarification in broader context:
Not sure to what extent it affects the travel history YOU reported in the residency calculation,
if any at all, but in various scenarios entry and exit records from other countries do not accurately reflect exit dates from Canada or entry into Canada (generally excepting U.S. records of entry from Canada, which almost always correspond to the date of exit from Canada, and which IRCC, through CBSA, can access apart from what the client/applicant submits).
There is probably less deviation with European destinations than Asian, noting for example that entry records into Asian countries can sometimes be two days later than the actual date of exit from Canada, given travel time and crossing the international date line. Nonetheless, for many of those who take overnight trans-Atlantic flights (which were at least common back when I was doing such travel), for another example, the entry date into the UK or France or other European destination is a day later than the date of exit from Canada.
That is, reporting exit or entry dates based on dates of entry into or exit from other countries can be an error.
For applicants who make such errors in their reported travel history, typically a one day though sometimes a two day error, this will not directly affect the eligibility of an applicant applying with a good buffer above the minimum physical presence requirement. No likelihood that such discrepancies would raise suspicion of misrepresentation either. But any discrepancy will of course indicate the applicant is to some extent at least a poor reporter of the facts, if not an inaccurate reporter, and can raise concerns about credibility that can trigger additional non-routine inquiries to verify the applicant's information, potentially leading to longer processing times.
For those who apply with little or no buffer, such errors can result in the application failing.
Bottom-line: there is no substitute for personally keeping a complete and accurate record of the precise date of exit and date of entry for every trip outside Canada, even if it is just taking a walk out to the middle of the Rainbow Bridge, to look at the Niagara Falls from that vantage point, and back. Applicants who submit a complete and accurate travel history, as well as a complete and accurate address and work history, and apply with a buffer, are making as solid a case for meeting the presence requirement as can be made in the citizenship application. And even though IRCC can always pursue further inquiries into physical presence, including requesting additional information from the applicant, those who submit a complete and accurate travel history, and address and work history likewise, and apply with a buffer, have damn good odds there are no processing delays due to physical presence verification.
