AOR in April 2017 - Let's Connect Here!

[astralsource]

R10 completion means?
Is it completeness of our documents?

Yes.

 

[whimsical]

Hi
My AOR -5 April
Medical passed- 22 April
NBG - 22 April
Background NA - 3 June
No recent update so worried

There is nothing to worry.

You have completed your IP1. You should get your IP2 soon.

The step before your BG status turning IP2 is where they check your NOC, Work Experience, POF, Travel History, etc. So ideally it will take time (based on individual's file).

Good luck !!

 

[astralsource]

When they are checking Birth certificates for children/dependants?

 

[whimsical]

When they are checking Birth certificates for children/dependants?

To check/confirm the relationship of the applicant and dependent.

 

[johnsyk]

I have heard that there some people like that in tracker, but never seen anyone in this forum. Two to three weeks after medical pass is the most hot period when maximum rejections for R10 seem to get reported.

If it moves from IP1 to NA, does that mean, R10 is passed and chances of rejection considerably reduced? Mine changed to NA in just 12 hours after IP1. So I reckon they are doing R10 checks even before medicals are passed!

 

[m231989]

hi please add me on whatsapp for AOR April

 

[gurik]

If it moves from IP1 to NA, does that mean, R10 is passed and chances of rejection considerably reduced? Mine changed to NA in just 12 hours after IP1. So I reckon they are doing R10 checks even before medicals are passed!

Rejection due to missing documents is almost eliminated after IP 1 is complete, So in that sense you are safe, but there is still eligibility (as in most genuine cases security and criminality is not much issue for responsible law abiding citizens) i.e your experience is genuine and in align with your NOC etc. Your education is bonafide etc.
If you are confident about the above I would say in my opinion, your chances for rejection have considerably reduced. Wish you all the best.

P.S- Mostly R10 and medicals go side by side independently of each other, hence people usually get update on BG check as soon as medical is passed because the other process (R 10) was already being done.

 

[vishalg]

Rejection due to missing documents is almost eliminated after IP 1 is complete, So in that sense you are safe, but there is still eligibility (as in most genuine cases security and criminality is not much issue for responsible law abiding citizens) i.e your experience is genuine, relevant, and in align with your NOC etc. Your education is bonafide and relevant to your work etc.
If you are confident about the above I would say in my opinion, your chances for rejection have considerably reduced. Wish you all the best.

P.S- Mostly R10 and medicals go side by side independently of each other, hence people usually get update on BG check as soon as medical is passed because the other process (R 10) was already being done.

It is not mandatory that education and work ex should correlate.

 

[gurik]

It is not mandatory that education and work ex should correlate.

As per my knowledge they should be in some alignment, meaning for example someone has done B.Sc Food Science and is working as a manger at some clothing store, he cannot then claim points for his B.Sc. In that way, I meant that the points you claim for education should be in alignment with your work, otherwise you will only be eligible for points in either one of them not both.

P.S- I do not claim to be a expert, just someone who has researched, I could be wrong. i ask other members also to express their views in this regard, so that no misleading information is passed on. It is most important that correct information is spread.

 

[vishalg]

As per my knowledge they should be in some alignment, meaning for example someone has done B.Sc Food Science and is working as a manger at some clothing store, he cannot then claim points for his B.Sc. In that way, I meant that the points you claim for education should be in alignment with your work, otherwise you will only be eligible for points in either one of them not both.

Not required for Canada. This is mandatory for Australia.
Here they just ask when did you qualify for that particular job. That qualifier could be a diploma, a graduation degree or a masters degree. This is in exception of licensed occupations.

 

[gurik]

Not required for Canada. This is mandatory for Australia.
Here they just ask when did you qualify for that particular job. That qualifier could be a diploma, a graduation degree or a masters degree. This is in exception of licensed occupations.

Yes, I am aware of that. This is what I meant with some kind of alignment, that you should have basic qualification related to the NOC you are applying for. Under every NOC it is mentioned that one should have some degree or diploma in that category to be eligible to claim pints for that NOC.
It cannot be any degree or diploma, it has to be discipline related as per my understanding.
When you go to the "find your NOC" link, it is clearly mentioned under "Employment Requirements" that you need qualifications in that discipline to be eligible for that NOC.
For example someone's NOC is 2134 , there in it is clearly mentioned that one should have so and so qualifications to be applying under that NOC.
Link-http://noc.esdc.gc.ca/English/noc/Q...93.1497691257-872513076.1494146528&val65=2134

 

[astralsource]

Not required for Canada. This is mandatory for Australia.
Here they just ask when did you qualify for that particular job. That qualifier could be a diploma, a graduation degree or a masters degree. This is in exception of licensed occupations.

I also have information that education and work experience can be completely unrelated! Or else half of the people here would be ineligible for Canada immi!

Of course you need to have a degree for most of these positions we claim points in work experince, but it can be unrelated to that job. Or not?

 

[eastyork]

can anyone tell me what checks take place specifically in each of the 3 stages of background checks; ip1, na, ip2 before they request for passport.

 

[astralsource]

As per my knowledge they should be in some alignment, meaning for example someone has done B.Sc Food Science and is working as a manger at some clothing store, he cannot then claim points for his B.Sc. In that way, I meant that the points you claim for education should be in alignment with your work, otherwise you will only be eligible for points in either one of them not both.

P.S- I do not claim to be a expert, just someone who has researched, I could be wrong. i ask other members also to express their views in this regard, so that no misleading information is passed on. It is most important that correct information is spread.

I think this isnt correct.. @legalfalcon please help clarify.

 

[gurik]

Not required for Canada. This is mandatory for Australia.
Here they just ask when did you qualify for that particular job. That qualifier could be a diploma, a graduation degree or a masters degree. This is in exception of licensed occupations.

In Australia third parties like VETASSESS etc. verify your employment relevance and authenticity, Canada makes this decision on its own without third party involvement. But as per my understanding there needs to be some correlation.