Thanks a lot for your reply, I will check the link.
I understand all that, although I do not know what could have triggered my screening, I get it, they decided to check and they are checking it, whatever.
My problem is with the attitude, I do not ask for a favor, I am simply asking for somethign that is in theory guaranteed to me by Canadian law. I don't need beg them for information, like all this "tell me how many voters in your family or we won't help", what kind of MP even does this?
Honestly this is just disappointing, I wasn't expecting to get this sort of reactions.
I simply cannot understand what sort of backlog can a service have to be unable to reply to ATIP request in 297 days?
I feel like they are mishandling the cases a lot, and there are internal priorities that they won't tell us, maybe they decided that our case isn't important. This sort of things should be public I think, you can't put low priority on my case without telling me at least in a reply so I know what to do.
100% agree. The issue is indeed sysmatic and not simple individual's bad luck. The government often stated in the following ways. Basically, if they do not fund the program, the scenario can not be improved....
'CSIS has advised NSIRA that the
time it takes to provide security advice is influenced by several factors, including the prioritization of files, resource limitations, and priorities established by the Government of Canada, such as special immigration measures and humanitarian initiatives in response to crises around the world.'' (NSIRA annual report 2024)
''The
Immigration National Security Screening Program has faced pressures due to increasing volumes and new demands, including continually high referral volumes as a result of recent immigration facilitation initiatives implemented by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) and other government departments, as well as geopolitical events (such as armed conflicts or natural disasters) and associated humanitarian initiatives. In addition, the program's current case management software is aging and the program continues to support the project lead for Security Screening Automation.
These factors have led to an increased number of time-sensitive and complex cases, placing pressure on program capacity. The CBSA is working with partners to address these pressures and has launched a number of program enhancement initiatives to optimize business processes and structures.'' (CBSA department plan 2026-2027)
The CBSA plays a key role in preventing inadmissible persons from entering and remaining in Canada, with priority given to cases involving organized crime, security, and human rights violations. Once the CBSA receives a file for security screening, we aim to complete screening within the service standards.
Every application is unique and some are impacted by competing priorities. Numerous steps have been recently taken to address this issue, such as risk based asylum screening which is a triage of asylum claims using indicators to identify potential risks and assess whether more comprehensive screening is warranted. The CBSA is continuously reviewing and improving internal processes and take the necessary action to address any identified program gaps. (response to e-7259 (Citizenship and immigration)
The border agency (CBSA) said the three government bodies are taking key steps to reduce screening backlogs, including training and onboarding additional officers and improving processes. The number began to fall for the first time since 2021, and further reductions are forecast.
Currently, pending cases include 69,800 temporary resident applications, 31,300 permanent resident files and 73,400 refugee claims. (Total 174,500 pending security screening). (Toronto Star, August, 2026,
Canada is spending big to recruit top global minds. They may find it hard to stay in the country — if they can even get in)