Hi all,
I’m a Privately Sponsored Refugee (PSR) applicant whose PR application was refused, and I’m planning to submit a reconsideration request to the visa office. The visa officer refused my application based on the fact that I couldn't show that I can't return to "ALL" areas of my home country! Which after doing some research seems erroneous.
Anyways, I’m not asking about strategy for my specific case, but about the core elements that should be in every reconsideration request after a PR refusal (especially PSR), regardless of the refusal reason. Also I where or how should I send it (as a webform or as an email response to the refusal email)?
From people who have done this or practitioners who know this area, what would you say are the essential parts of a solid reconsideration request letter? For example, should it always include:
Thanks in advance.
I’m a Privately Sponsored Refugee (PSR) applicant whose PR application was refused, and I’m planning to submit a reconsideration request to the visa office. The visa officer refused my application based on the fact that I couldn't show that I can't return to "ALL" areas of my home country! Which after doing some research seems erroneous.
Anyways, I’m not asking about strategy for my specific case, but about the core elements that should be in every reconsideration request after a PR refusal (especially PSR), regardless of the refusal reason. Also I where or how should I send it (as a webform or as an email response to the refusal email)?
From people who have done this or practitioners who know this area, what would you say are the essential parts of a solid reconsideration request letter? For example, should it always include:
- Clear identification of the file (name, DOB, UCI, app number, refusal date, visa office).
- A short statement of what I’m asking for (reopen file and change/refine the decision).
- A concise summary of the officer’s main reasons for refusal, in neutral language.
- Point‑by‑point explanation of where the officer made an error (facts, law, or misunderstanding/overlooking evidence).
- References to specific documents already in the file and/or any new documents, with a short explanation of how each one addresses an error.
- A brief conclusion repeating the request (reopen, reconsider, and approve or re‑assess).
- Is there a “best practice” structure or length (e.g., under X pages, numbered headings, table of contents, etc.)?
- Is there any usual way people send it (reply to refusal email vs webform) that’s considered standard for reconsideration requests?
Thanks in advance.
