Let's say i go about submitting my citizenship on my own and there happens to be a complication/questions/ in the worst case a rejection.
Can i then at that stage, go about finding and hiring a lawyer to help midway through /or after rejection to appeal or re-apply ?
Or is that something that's not possible at all and one has to hire a lawyer to represent you before applying in the first place ?
I seem to have understood the process and think i can do it myself and save the extra $, but just wondering about this as i plan to apply soon.
Additionally, What does a rejection of citizenship application (due to failure to verify physical presence) then mean for one's PR status. Would you still remain a PR and can re-apply for citizenship whenever at a later stage ?
I concur in observations posted by
@armoured including, in particular and with some emphasis, that the citizenship application is simple and straightforward enough the vast majority of applicants do not need and do not obtain assistance from lawyers. It is probably quite unusual to hire a lawyer.
A significant number of citizenship applicants who need help navigating transactions generally probably rely on assistance from others, including some formally relying on a "
representative" (who can be trusted family or friend so long as they are not being paid to be a representative). So do not hesitate to get help from someone you trust.
Frankly, your situation (no international travel for many years, among other factors) in conjunction with your level of concern about potential rejection and consequences hints there is some issue bothering you. Hard to guess if you are just overthinking things (which is quite common), a little or even a lot paranoid (plenty of cause for that these days), or there is something in particular. If it is about being very cautious, relax, read and follow the instructions, get someone you trust to go over the instructions with you and to help you complete the application.
If you have not left Canada for many years (as your post about a PR card application indicates), meaning months more than three years at least, it is not likely your application would be denied for failing to meet the physical presence requirement. But, if it is denied because of physical presence, that would have no impact on a future application.
If your concern about physical presence is related to things like being on probation or having been incarcerated or otherwise about criminal charges (that for obvious reasons you would be reluctant to share online), that's a more complicated discussion and the particular details matter. If this is the situation, again maybe a trusted family member or friend could help you go over things, or you could share more information online (limited and carefully), or that might be a scenario in which a lawyer's help would be useful (probably just a paid consultation, paying a lawyer to review your situation in detail, not necessarily needing the lawyer to make the application).
But a serious suggestion or point: for the last several years at least IRCC has had / has access to decent entry-exit records. If you have some doubt about physical presence, or the number of days, or your own records - wait until you have the required number of days plus a decent buffer (amount really dependent on how complex).
Rest of post is a good overview applicable to almost any PR qualified for a grant of citizenship.
And, of course, this particular observation about travel history and when to apply is prudent advice for many, many applicants.
But . . . your last paragraph regarding pre-PR credit is not likely to be relevant because this individual appears to have landed as a PR more than eight years ago, or at least, as you are probably aware (given
your response to the OP's query about supporting documents for a PR card application yesterday) a PR long enough for their PR card to expire many years ago. Which I mention only because in conjunction with other aspects of the OP's posts, noting too that the OP states (in the other thread) they never bothered to renew their PR card because they "
didn't need to travel internationally . . . " for me (anyway) there are some curiosity flags waving for someone who has been a PR for more than eight years just now applying for a new PR card and citizenship, concerned about needing a lawyer to apply for citizenship, various other factual circumstances (including, just for example, zero income but filing tax returns). Could be overthinking or paranoia, or . . . wondering if something else might be going on (some of which I get into a bit above in response to OP).