As I explained if mother can prove she is in danger going back to home country then there won't be any problems. Because her son's withdrawal is reasonable. It is not like someone who drops their case and decide to go back to their country.
Friend got married mum proceeding with case .
- Thread starter Vips1410
- Start date
If you read the posts the son was the true person at risk and they explained that in the asylum application. The mother’s risk was not the true focus of the asylum claim but they incorrectly assumed that they would be considered together. The mother seems to have accompanied the son because she was living with him and wants to continue living with him primarily for cultural reasons. She has 2 daughters in her home country that she can’t live with as stated. Assume they live with their in-laws. The mother has to work with her lawyer to reframe the situation based on her experience but IRB will have the old copy explaining that the risk is primarily for the son.
Because it’s already been explained . They thought when they claimed for asylum it was going to be a two for one application.
It’s not . In a nut shell ,moms on her own and has to PROVE her own case .
This cultural thing of “ I gotta tag along & live with my son when I have daughters in my home country, is a tad ridiculous.
Son is PA and mother was accompanying member.You cant just change BOC in a middle of the way and say i also face persecution/danger and i cant go back after PA withdrew his claim. you dont have to make it look easy, poster need to consult a lawyer
Most of guys not getting my point here how can you assume only my friend was in danger they have mention is story they picked guy and torture mother was not at home that day luckily but mother got life threatened also so I don’t why someone mention culture thing there is no cultural thing or she tagged along with my friend they both were in trouble this is why they had to flew away just 4 months away her husband and friend dad death in suspicious way which I can’t mention here but people who threatened surely they killed him so you guys judging his story wrongly .
We are not trying to be dismissive but based on your original post, you wrote " ALL evidence was against son". provided mum does not have evidence, its kinda tough. but at the en it is up to member to decide her case...
My friend went with his wife last month europe on holidays when he reached at Montreal airport instead of scan his pr card he scanned his passport because they both did not have arrive can custom stop both of them wife is Canadian citizen husband got pr Because he scanned passport they knew his history in Canada they asked him from where u coming why you traveling your home country passport he explained then once upon a time he was asylum seeker but he got married he withdraw his case so got his pr through family so he is free to use his home passport and travel where he wants then officer checked in his computer and he found my friend was speaking truth than he said sorry to him and told him I am sorry we mainly stop you because u did not have arrive can plus you scanned your passport next time if you have arrive can or you scan your pr card instead of passport no one will ever ask you any questions sorry for inconvenience we have checked you got pr through family so you free to fly even your home country because you not did not get your pr through protection person or asylum seeker .
It’s not about topic it’s very good information first thing always make sure use arrive can before reached Canada help so much save your time second if someone already got pr try to scanned pr card don’t use passport it will save you from unnecessary hassle which my friend went through .