EE Eligibility: Review Required Please Connect
- Thread starter lolololohyeah
- Start date
Hello!
I have the same problem. Here is my timeline:
FSW-I
AOR- May 26
MEP- June 6 went directly to IP2
Ghost Update- June 19
Nothing since then...
I called CIC and was informed the June 19 ghost update was due to a change in status for eligibility from in progress to Review Required and my application is being processed in CIO Sydney..
Do you guys think they will have to call my previous employers abroad? Shouldnt my application be transfered to a local visa office if this was the case?
Also, I was under PGWP implied status the entire time (AOR to Ghost Update). I just had my PGWP approved recently.. could this be the reason for the required review?? Please help! Lol
I have the same problem. Here is my timeline:
FSW-I
AOR- May 26
MEP- June 6 went directly to IP2
Ghost Update- June 19
Nothing since then...
I called CIC and was informed the June 19 ghost update was due to a change in status for eligibility from in progress to Review Required and my application is being processed in CIO Sydney..
Do you guys think they will have to call my previous employers abroad? Shouldnt my application be transfered to a local visa office if this was the case?
Also, I was under PGWP implied status the entire time (AOR to Ghost Update). I just had my PGWP approved recently.. could this be the reason for the required review?? Please help! Lol
I called cic and was also told eligibility review required and security underway. Passed medical and criminality. Also in IP2? I have just orderd gcsm note. Should I be concern? AOR is may 16. Thanks.
Do you know what happened to your LOE that trigged the "review required"?I called cic and was also told eligibility review required and security underway. Passed medical and criminality. Also in IP2? I have just orderd gcsm note. Should I be concern? AOR is may 16. Thanks.
Does anybody have any idea why Case analyst marked my case as 'Review required' while in recommendation its 'Recommendation pass'? Aor 7th Jan, FSW, Ottawa office.
Here is the link to my analyst notes -
http://i65.tinypic.com/2mzfwn.png
Here is the link to my analyst notes -
http://i65.tinypic.com/2mzfwn.png
I guess because of the comment about previous refusal and Indian PCC case analyst may have asked he officer to review the application... just my guessDoes anybody have any idea why Case analyst marked my case as 'Review required' while in recommendation its 'Recommendation pass'? Aor 7th Jan, FSW, Ottawa office.
Here is the link to my analyst notes -
http://i65.tinypic.com/2mzfwn.png
Is the PCC issue old one or the new one ??
Probably then nothing to worry about, he wants case officer to look and sign offPCC issue was for old one. I have passed the criminality check in the current application. Couldn't find any negative comment in the notes received.
Hi, I’m kinda in the same situation. I ordered gcms notes and it was pretty vague- no reason was given. Last Tuesday, I got an ADR for pay stubs and w2s in the last 3 years, proof of legal status in the US for the past 5 years and official transcripts of all US degrees. It was pretty straightforward for me, I think. It’s pretty much a verification step. I’d to send 108 pages worh of documents, but I feel much better, since that’s all they wanted from me.I called cic and was also told eligibility review required and security underway. Passed medical and criminality. Also in IP2? I have just orderd gcsm note. Should I be concern? AOR is may 16. Thanks.
I also got an ADR to submit payslips and salary deposits for the last six months. Also I was asked to resend my job description on a company letter head.Hi, I’m kinda in the same situation. I ordered gcms notes and it was pretty vague- no reason was given. Last Tuesday, I got an ADR for pay stubs and w2s in the last 3 years, proof of legal status in the US for the past 5 years and official transcripts of all US degrees. It was pretty straightforward for me, I think. It’s pretty much a verification step. I’d to send 108 pages worh of documents, but I feel much better, since that’s all they wanted from me.
Hello May I ask what triggered them to ask you about those things? I thought having a reference would suffice.I also got an ADR to submit payslips and salary deposits for the last six months. Also I was asked to resend my job description on a company letter head.
Ok cool. Did you hear back when you sent the docs?I also got an ADR to submit payslips and salary deposits for the last six months. Also I was asked to resend my job description on a company letter head.
Didn't you provide job description on the company letter earlier e.g. the Reference Letter?I also got an ADR to submit payslips and salary deposits for the last six months. Also I was asked to resend my job description on a company letter head.
I did provide those documents before but I don't why they asked for it again. I think because I made some changes post ITA in my eapr. I revised my job title twice for one job and thrice for another. Bank statements do substantiate my employment claim.Didn't you provide job description on the company letter earlier e.g. the Reference Letter?
Its says not applicableOk cool. Did you hear back when you sent the docs?