+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
maybe the Sydney office will process the whole Outland application ...

Not likely, Sydney is the intake center, initial processing and requests then they farm it out from there. Never heard of any app being totally processed there.
 
Not likely, Sydney is the intake center, initial processing and requests then they farm it out from there. Never heard of any app being totally processed there.
Yeah, that is what I am thinking. They will get the AOR1 done and the SA... but beyond that, it will slow back down again because of the VO backlog. UGG... at least it is a step in the right direction and all the people protesting and complaining are doing a little bit of good.
 
Yeah, that is what I am thinking. They will get the AOR1 done and the SA... but beyond that, it will slow back down again because of the VO backlog. UGG... at least it is a step in the right direction and all the people protesting and complaining are doing a little bit of good.

Think it is primarily because backlogs causing more issues for IRCC not the actual applicants. Things like student and work permits have a big economic impact.
 
Only good until AOR1. After that file transfer to Local VO and they are slower. But hope for the best.

Not likely, Sydney is the intake center, initial processing and requests then they farm it out from there. Never heard of any app being totally processed there.

While I agree that it probably doesn't mean that they'll start doing entire process out of Sydney, it is possible that they'll start using that office for more support for subsequent stages or other issues that come up. Or possibly as part of other changes more steps done at Sydney from beginning.

Pure speculation on my part but they also seem to be doing other things they've not done before, like having files processed in offices (like in China) in completely different parts of the world.
 
Think it is primarily because backlogs causing more issues for IRCC not the actual applicants. Things like student and work permits have a big economic impact.

I don't outright disagree with this, in situation as at present where many potential immigrants can't even travel to the country, it is possible there is a change in focus (partial anyway) to family class. And economic impact of family sponsorship applicants is not zero.

They have big targets for immigration numbers and no way to meet them at present - at least not under the pre-pandemic approach. This is clearly causing them to re-think some aspects of the current system.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opi...rong-with-its-immigration-system-by-slamming/

This is not mostly about family class but there are elements that touch on family reunification being (likely) a bigger part gong forward.
 
I don't outright disagree with this, in situation as at present where many potential immigrants can't even travel to the country, it is possible there is a change in focus (partial anyway) to family class. And economic impact of family sponsorship applicants is not zero.

They have big targets for immigration numbers and no way to meet them at present - at least not under the pre-pandemic approach. This is clearly causing them to re-think some aspects of the current system.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opi...rong-with-its-immigration-system-by-slamming/

This is not mostly about family class but there are elements that touch on family reunification being (likely) a bigger part gong forward.

Read the tweet this increase was specifically for outland spousal applicants. Stand by my thoughts that economic immigration processing or applications that will affect the economy will receive a lot of extra resources because without the economy bouncing back everyone in Canada will suffer more. There are plenty of family sponsorship that doesn't impact the labour market. Family sponsorship doesn't prioritize high skilled or needed skills. Assume that faster processing for targeted industries is one of the ways forward. Still think citizenship requirement needs to move to 5 years to retain talent for longer if their ultimate plan is the US. Less loopholes for H1B workers to work remotely from Canada while using services, getting citizenship and barely paying taxes. Many would switch to consulting. Although we have immigration targets there will be a very fine balance between getting those in Canada back to work without flooding the market with new immigrants. We want to grow the economy so it gets back to pre-covid levels but we also don't want to flood the market with new immigrants while those already in Canada are unemployed. We'll just end up with more unemployed. Would also like PGP paused until we at least eliminate the healthcare backlogs that were created due to covid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Copingwithlife
Read the tweet this increase was specifically for outland spousal applicants. Stand by my thoughts that economic immigration processing or applications that will affect the economy will receive a lot of extra resources because without the economy bouncing back everyone in Canada will suffer more. There are plenty of family sponsorship that doesn't impact the labour market. Family sponsorship doesn't prioritize high skilled or needed skills. Assume that faster processing for targeted industries is one of the ways forward.

I understand your point of view, although I don't agree with all of it (and do agree with some of it).

My points are/were that a) assuming family sponsorship has no positive economic impact is wrong (PGP aside), and because arrivals are constrained due to covid rules, outland applicants is one area they can focus on increasing at present. So 'applications that affect the economy' - when arrivals for non-family are limited - may mean focussing on what they can do.

And the article hinted at another: that pandemic may be causing a re-think (esp for those already in-Canada) about how effective the prioritization of "high skilled and needed skills" has been. As he also notes, the environment in terms of where (global) immigrants want to go is also changing.

That said, I don't know for sure either, and Saunders' article may not reflect actual departmental thinking (I suspect it does to some degree and he has contacts) - and of course what comes out of the policy meatgrinder will be affected by politics and the real world of how long covid restrictions stay in place.

The announcement could, of course, just be a short-term measure to deal with a backlog. Personally I doubt it, the up-front costs and frictions of hiring, training, etc are such that I don't think they'd add so many people just for that - but I don't know.

If I'm right, however, the idea behind it would be to speed up/increase capacity for family reunification.
 
Immigration is not a long term solution to demographic issues. As developing countries become more developed fewer people will be willing to immigrate to Canada or any other developed countries. What canadian government should do is to encourage families to have more children. Birth rate is the best way to replace population. Some European countries have started to implement it successfully and their birthrate is slowly increasing.
 
Immigration is not a long term solution to demographic issues.

Depends what you mean by long term, of course.

What canadian government should do is to encourage families to have more children. Birth rate is the best way to replace population. Some European countries have started to implement it successfully and their birthrate is slowly increasing.

Not that I'm opposed to such measures, but what countries are you referring to?

I'm somewhat familiar with the numbers for a few countries and I'm not aware of any country that's had a level of success using such numbers remotely comparable to the numbers targetted by Canadian government policy. Perhaps some combination of immigration plus other measures, but 'birth rate' measures alone, no.