- Sep 30, 2012
- 95
- 1
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- London
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 16-11-2012
- Doc's Request.
- 29-04-2013
- AOR Received.
- 26-11-2012
- Med's Done....
- 02-10-2012
- Interview........
- Waived
- Passport Req..
- Exempt
- VISA ISSUED...
- 18-07-2013
- LANDED..........
- 31-07-2013
Hi CanadaVisa family,
I'm looking for your help with this: DH and I received from London VO yesterday, asking us to explain some gaps in his travel timeline. The gaps indicate an overstay on his Visitors Visa (he's from the UK so over 6 months). They want us to write another letter stating what his status was during those times, even though we thought we made it clear in the application initially.
The overstay was fairly significant (+1 year). The reason for the overstay is simple really: We were young and naive about immigration, then we fell in love and he stayed. During that time he was never approached by immigration, he never worked illegally (either his parents supported him or I did), and he never encountered any issues coming back to Canada. He's currently here on another Visitors Visa and we've applied to extend it hoping that his PR will be completed. When we submitted his PR he was on a totally legal Visitors Visa (in November 2012).
Any advice to not make us sound like idiots to the VO? Or better yet, how should we phrase this in the most positive light possible?
Thanks for looking!
I'm looking for your help with this: DH and I received from London VO yesterday, asking us to explain some gaps in his travel timeline. The gaps indicate an overstay on his Visitors Visa (he's from the UK so over 6 months). They want us to write another letter stating what his status was during those times, even though we thought we made it clear in the application initially.
The overstay was fairly significant (+1 year). The reason for the overstay is simple really: We were young and naive about immigration, then we fell in love and he stayed. During that time he was never approached by immigration, he never worked illegally (either his parents supported him or I did), and he never encountered any issues coming back to Canada. He's currently here on another Visitors Visa and we've applied to extend it hoping that his PR will be completed. When we submitted his PR he was on a totally legal Visitors Visa (in November 2012).
Any advice to not make us sound like idiots to the VO? Or better yet, how should we phrase this in the most positive light possible?
Thanks for looking!
