+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

chiron

Star Member
Jul 28, 2015
108
5
Category........
Visa Office......
New Delhi
NOC Code......
2131
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
AOR Received.
09-02-2016
Med's Done....
11-02-2016
Passport Req..
07-04-2016
VISA ISSUED...
16-04-2016
LANDED..........
03-08-2016
I recall reading somewhere not to take decisions regarding handing in notice at the job etc after PPR and to wait for CoPR before making any major decisions. Have there been any cases of people not getting CoPR after sending passport? I am asking coz the company I am working in has 3 months notice period.
 
Extremely unlikely. Almost a given. But not 100% sure.

In the same way that we know gravity is universally attractive. Are we 100% sure about that? No. But do we assume that's the case? All the time.
 
Given how frequently such type of question is asked on this forum (for sure much more frequently than any other question) I tend to think that ppl who ask this question usually know the answer... Because, if you think a little bit, you would find that there is only one possible answer...
 
Whether you should hand your resignation or not is totally up to you.
 
TECC_Seneca said:
Asivad. What brilliant analogy! J ;D

brilliant? totally irrelevant. gravity is a natural phenomena and and cant be related to manmade process like immigration. They have right to reject anytime, even at landing. The simple reply would have been, yes they can reject.
 
bestofluck said:
brilliant? totally irrelevant. gravity is a natural phenomena and and cant be related to manmade process like immigration. They have right to reject anytime, even at landing. The simple reply would have been, yes they can reject.

That's how an analogy works.

They don't have a 'right' to reject anytime, they have a 'right' to select which they do exercise. The applicant has a 'duty' to present the required documentation(s) at all points throughout the process. And if the documentation is in order and PPR has been issued, the applicant has a 'right' to receive COPR and be admitted into Canada and CBSA has a 'right' to verify any and all documentation(s) required before admitting anyone into Canada. The simple reply is, they cannot reject your application between PPR and COPR unless they know that you have falsified information to get the said PPR. Even in that case, they cannot 'arbitrarily' reject your application - they still need to give you a fair chance to clarify things at your end. So there are more chances of being turned back at the Port of Entry (which are fairly minimal in themselves) than being refused between PPR and COPR (infinitesimal chances , non zero probability which is analogous NOT equivalent to the chances of gravity being repulsive in some corner of the Universe).

For someone who doesn't like the Canadian government's reliance on IELTS and English language, I expect you to not get the difference between analogy and equivalence hence had to spell it out.

Have a good day!
 
Asivad Anac said:
That's how an analogy works.

They don't have a 'right' to reject anytime, they have a 'right' to select which they do exercise. The applicant has a 'duty' to present the required documentation(s) at all points throughout the process. And if the documentation is in order and PPR has been issued, the applicant has a 'right' to receive COPR and be admitted into Canada and CBSA has a 'right' to verify any and all documentation(s) required before admitting anyone into Canada. The simple reply is, they cannot reject your application between PPR and COPR unless they know that you have falsified information to get the said PPR. Even in that case, they cannot 'arbitrarily' reject your application - they still need to give you a fair chance to clarify things at your end. So there are more chances of being turned back at the Port of Entry (which are fairly minimal in themselves) than being refused between PPR and COPR (infinitesimal chances , non zero probability which is analogous NOT equivalent to the chances of gravity being repulsive in some corner of the Universe).

For someone who doesn't like the Canadian government's reliance on IELTS and English language, I expect you to not get the difference between analogy and equivalence hence had to spell it out.

Have a good day!
Who r you? ??lol
 
ronnie_rocket_fan said:
He looks like he is a man of science, with a good grip over English language. Nice exchange :) enjoyed it !

yaa he is a man of science who is confused and thinks immigration process is also science. he compares a phenomena to a process.

A gravity and immigration process works on same principal....the new principal ....which says if an apple falls on ground you will definitely get PR.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: shaizeik
Immigration is a new principal of Physics.

01. Every applicant is attracted to the immigration process which is gravity of Immigration
02. An applicant only can get PR is he becomes fan of such scientists who make their day
03. Unless an external force by senior is applied your application dont move.
 
bestofluck said:
Immigration is a new principal of Physics.

01. Every applicant is attracted to the immigration process which is gravity of Immigration
02. An applicant only can get PR is he becomes fan of such scientists who make their day
03. Unless an external force by senior is applied your application dont move.

I guess you Didn't understand exactly what Mr. Asivad wanted to convey in context of the query put forward by Mr. Chiron. He answered with simple logic. However, I request you to not to deviate from the topic. If you have any in depth knowledge in relation to the original question being asked, please post it here, else just be silent observer. You don't have dig too deep into the realms of physics just to put your point above anyone else. It's totally uncalled for. People are here to help each other, not for cat fight.

Regards
 
bestofluck said:
yaa he is a man of science who is confused and thinks immigration process is also science. he compares a phenomena to a process.

A gravity and immigration process works on same principal....the new principal ....which says if an apple falls on ground you will definitely get PR.

Again it seems you prefer digging too deep to put forward your point which when analysed in context of the query seems thoroughly irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RakeshTaranath