+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

yixiaop26

Hero Member
Jul 22, 2014
932
6
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
Calendar year Year to date
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2013 (Jan-Mar) 2014(Jan-Mar)
Total Network Outcomes 488,581 449,277 355,781 370,726 325,886 89,415 103,847
Total Authorizations and Visas Issued 263,404 276,895 260,788 266,138 255,720 67,560 76,257


see, the pass rate in 2013 Jan-Mar is about 75% now 2014 it is 73% .


I am more worry now. because my confusing NOC and job title. 2283 , 2171, 2173. damn it .
 
yixiaop26 said:
Calendar year Year to date
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2013 (Jan-Mar) 2014(Jan-Mar)
Total Network Outcomes 488,581 449,277 355,781 370,726 325,886 89,415 103,847
Total Authorizations and Visas Issued 263,404 276,895 260,788 266,138 255,720 67,560 76,257


see, the pass rate in 2013 Jan-Mar is about 75% now 2014 it is 73% .


I am more worry now. because my confusing NOC and job title. 2283 , 2171, 2173. damn it .

Why are you worrying bout NOC? What are you doing testing, developing or analysis? Based on that chose your NOC. Do not confuse your self with the title of the job.
Best of luck.
 
canadacec123 said:
Why are you worrying bout NOC? What are you doing testing, developing or analysis? Based on that chose your NOC. Do not confuse your self with the title of the job.
Best of luck.



I didn't pay attention for the job title or whatever.

I find my material which used to apply work permit is 2171 , and my workpermit I finnally get is software engineer , 2173

and the dutties I used to apply work permit, I am 100% sure it is 2283 .

I heard duties matters more , so I use 2283 .

now I heard many case failed because they change A to B to fit the english level .

also I found some cases failed change 2171 to 2174.

any way, I search 2283 failed case, I can find 3-5 cases failed .

also I heard, some one in same company, same position, some is failed some is ok .

now I just worry .
 
It's just 2% difference, man. >:(

yixiaop26 said:
Calendar year Year to date
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2013 (Jan-Mar) 2014(Jan-Mar)
Total Network Outcomes 488,581 449,277 355,781 370,726 325,886 89,415 103,847
Total Authorizations and Visas Issued 263,404 276,895 260,788 266,138 255,720 67,560 76,257


see, the pass rate in 2013 Jan-Mar is about 75% now 2014 it is 73% .


I am more worry now. because my confusing NOC and job title. 2283 , 2171, 2173. damn it .
 
Are you on closed work permit? Does it says your job title? What kind of work permit you are holding?
 
canadacec123 said:
Are you on closed work permit? Does it says your job title? What kind of work permit you are holding?


the type is others when I apply , it would be a closed work permit . it is intra company transfer.

yes there is a title, software engineer. nothing more , and limit I can only work under that,

ridiculously is , when I apply work permit, my support letter's duties is 2283 , I don't know what to comment about this mess.
 
yixiaop26 said:
the type is others when I apply , it would be a closed work permit . it is intra company transfer.

yes there is a title, software engineer. nothing more , and limit I can only work under that,

ridiculously is , when I apply work permit, my support letter's duties is 2283 , I don't know what to comment about this mess.

If it is a closed work permit then I don't think so that you can use any other NOC but the one was used to get the work permit.
CIC usually does not mention the NOC on the workpermit but only title. On my closed work they have just mentioned the title but I know that when my company applied for the closed work permit for me they have mentioned the NOC code.

Having said that I should mention, my closed work permit was from LMO. I have no idea about the ICT.

However, I strongly believe CIC cannot issue closed work permit without NOC because it is like backbone of their structure.

I would say ask your company for the documents that they had submitted for the work permit application and use that NOC code. Work around your jobs and responsibilities based on that. This will be beneficial for you for long run.

Hope this help. Best of luck.
 
One logical reason to support that "CIC cannot issue clsoed workpermit without NOC"

CIC needs to know how much company is paying to you for which position (NOC code comes here). Because they have to maintain the labour standard in Canada.
 
yixiaop26 said:
Calendar year Year to date
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2013 (Jan-Mar) 2014(Jan-Mar)
Total Network Outcomes 488,581 449,277 355,781 370,726 325,886 89,415 103,847
Total Authorizations and Visas Issued 263,404 276,895 260,788 266,138 255,720 67,560 76,257


see, the pass rate in 2013 Jan-Mar is about 75% now 2014 it is 73% .


I am more worry now. because my confusing NOC and job title. 2283 , 2171, 2173. damn it .

Firstly, what's the source of this data?

Secondly, we don't know what composes the rest that didn't receive a visa. It's NOT JUST REJECTIONS. It could be application that don't qualify, applications that were withdrawn, or, finally, rejected. You can't imply that the rest is composed of ONLY rejected applications.

Don't freak out!


"pass rate" doesn't mean anything!
 
nettoyant said:
Firstly, what's the source of this data?

Secondly, we don't know what composes the rest that didn't receive a visa. It's NOT JUST REJECTIONS. It could be application that don't qualify, applications that were withdrawn, or, finally, rejected. You can't imply that the rest is composed of ONLY rejected applications.

Don't freak out!


"pass rate" doesn't mean anything!


it is from CIC website, I don't remember which link I clicked , maybe at the bottom of that website.


I am worry my case maybe rejected, because, I find a similar case rejected before .

although some similar case passed too.


I am freaked out actually.
 
yixiaop26 said:
it is from CIC website, I don't remember which link I clicked , maybe at the bottom of that website.


I am worry my case maybe rejected, because, I find a similar case rejected before .

although some similar case passed too.


I am freaked out actually.

Please, in the future refer to your sources so we can have better discussions.

Besides try to be careful when interpreting data.

There can be many reasons why the success visa rate has decreased from 75% to 73%. If you don't have data for what's happening the rest, then you cannot say for sure why it's happening.

Just to give you some food for thought, the reasons could be subjective like:
- It has become easier to apply and so more people are applying, but they are not necessarily qualified to apply
- People might be trying to apply to multiple streams, so when they get a visa they might withdraw any parallel application
- The government has created more immigration streams, so people applying to more than one have more options
- Because the government's website has been improved, more people now thing they qualify to apply so more people are applying (and they might not realize they don't qualify)
- Rules change and people don't realize applying anyway, so the application is rejected

I cannot validate any of these subjective assumptions without data. Even with data sometimes it's not possible to pinpoint the exact reason why!

Cheers,
 
nettoyant said:
Please, in the future refer to your sources so we can have better discussions.

Besides try to be careful when interpreting data.

There can be many reasons why the success visa rate has decreased from 75% to 73%. If you don't have data for what's happening the rest, then you cannot say for sure why it's happening.

Just to give you some food for thought, the reasons could be subjective like:
- It has become easier to apply and so more people are applying, but they are not necessarily qualified to apply
- People might be trying to apply to multiple streams, so when they get a visa they might withdraw any parallel application
- The government has created more immigration streams, so people applying to more than one have more options
- Because the government's website has been improved, more people now thing they qualify to apply so more people are applying (and they might not realize they don't qualify)
- Rules change and people don't realize applying anyway, so the application is rejected

I cannot validate any of these subjective assumptions without data. Even with data sometimes it's not possible to pinpoint the exact reason why!

Cheers,

hope so, but it is downing . :(