Love letters

[jma]

i just want to know how to save my msn chat?
pple are dyng 2 gt any info about this ques please try to explain
and we'll be safe

 

[Kess]

i just want to know how to save my msn chat?
pple are dyng 2 gt any info about this ques please try to explain
and we'll be safe

I don't have access to my MSN as I am at work still. I can post something when I get home but it wont be for a few hours.

Update:

Select Tools from the menu options in MSN > Options > then select "Messages" from the options listed on the left.
Make sure there is a checkmark in "Automatically keep a history of my conversations"
Then below will be a path called "Save my conversations in this folder:" which will show you were to find them.

The files are saved in XML format but when you open them (they open by default in a internet browser window) you can highlight the text and paste into a word document.

Will look something like this:

15/03/2010 3:59:10 PM Cheshire Kess poke*
15/03/2010 3:59:17 PM Kess Cheshire *poke*

 

[BeShoo]

I was reading some immigration appeals board cases recently and I saved the excerpts that follow from two of these cases. It should give you some insight into what they are sometimes looking for in these kinds of letters (probably that you shouldn't cross out all the intimate parts):

... they began discussing the possibility of marriage sometime early in 2006, well before he went to visit the applicant for the first time. Yet the email correspondence that was provided to me for that time period does not demonstrate a developing affection between this couple, nor does any of that email correspondence corroborate that there were any conversations about marriage taking place or any plans for the future in that regard.

Their correspondence is primarily via email, yet they have only emailed each other two or three times per week and only from the appellant’s work. Their emails do not demonstrate a closeness in the relationship. The tone and topic of the emails tends to be not intimate.

From another case:

Counsel for the Minister suggested to the appellant at the hearing that the letters the couple sent to each other were “very general” and “bland”. The panel finds that these letters are just that. They are not intimate in nature and represent a fairly objective discussion between a couple who are living in separate parts of the world. This is a negative weight in this appeal.

 

[sbwv09]

its interesting when ppl get interviewed i wonder y and compare it to my friends situation...

she had an arranged marriage was engaged and then got married so total like 7 months knowing each other thats it! she had no interview nothing :S weird huh?

In many cultures, this is very typical of how marriages take place, and CIC takes this into consideration. I suppose if both parties were from countries that don't usually have arranged marriages, it would be much different.

I had a fire a few years ago and lost a lot of what I had, so I mostly have emails as opposed to 'hard' copies of anything.. hopefully it will be enough! (I explained about the fire and had proof of it)

 

[bonbon9]

I was reading some immigration appeals board cases recently and I saved the excerpts that follow from two of these cases. It should give you some insight into what they are sometimes looking for in these kinds of letters (probably that you shouldn't cross out all the intimate parts):

From another case:

Thanks, Beshoo! This is very useful!