Inadmissible

[dotmanw24]

Hello guy's, I applied for a temporary visa to visit Canada and got refused, kindly advised the time frame I can reapply..Below is the mail I received

Thank you for your interest in visiting Canada. After careful review of your temporary resident visa application and supporting documentation, I have determined that your application does not meet the requirements of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) and Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (IRPR). I am refusing your application on the following grounds:



You have been found inadmissible to Canada in accordance with paragraph 40(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) for directly or indirectly misrepresenting or withholding material facts relating to a relevant matter that induces or co

+

+

+

+

+

+



You are welcome to reapply if you feel that you can respond to these concerns and can demonstrate that your situation meets the requirements. All new applications must be accompanied by a new processing fee.

 

[canuck78]

Did you receive a ban?

 

[dotmanw24]

Did you receive a ban?

No I did not get a ban, but before the final decision I got a Procedure fair letter and I responded .I made a mistake about not declaring My previous visa refusal to other country

 

[canuck78]

No I did not get a ban, but before the final decision I got a Procedure fair letter and I responded .I made a mistake about not declaring My previous visa refusal to other country

You can apply right away then. Don’t forget to declare this new refusal with the old one. You got lucky since others have received a ban.

 

[Kaurnavjot025]

Hi
I have same refusal for my study visa then that mean I didn’t get a ban?

 

[scylla]

Hi
I have same refusal for my study visa then that mean I didn’t get a ban?

Depends. Does your letter mention a 5 year ban?

 

[Kaurnavjot025]

In my letter they just mention this You have been found inadmissible to Canada in accordance with paragraph 40(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) for directly or indirectly misrepresenting or withholding material facts relating to a relevant matter
They didn’t mention any 5 year ban in my refusal letter so that I don’t have any ban from canada?

 

[jweekend]

In my letter they just mention this You have been found inadmissible to Canada in accordance with paragraph 40(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) for directly or indirectly misrepresenting or withholding material facts relating to a relevant matter
They didn’t mention any 5 year ban in my refusal letter so that I don’t have any ban from canada?

Inadmissible means you cannot enter, at all.

 

[Kaurnavjot025]

But I enter already when i apply for visitor visa I already mention my refsual that my study visa was denied and when I arrived they ask me about my refusal then I explain to them that i got a refusal for study visa. So that’s mean i am not banned from Canada?

 

[bongoman]

If you were banned it would clearly say so in the refusal letter. So you are fine.

 

[Kaurnavjot025]

Thank you

 

[Nirvan]

I have applied for my mother super visa but due there was a genuine mistake when filling out the form. Instead of choosing Yes I ticked on No when asked if she was rejected visa before. However, our intentions were never to hide it as we have clearly mentioned in the Purpose of Entry letter that she had applied for Tourist Vusa twice and was rejected. It was simply a mistake while filling out the Application form.
I received the letter from IRCC that if found guilty there would be a 5 year ban.
I am guilty in filling out the form incorrectly but it was just a mistake I was not trying to hide anything.
I have explained it to them via email. Waiting for the response.