+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

peace123

Star Member
Jul 11, 2019
154
30
Under the new Biden administration asylum seekers are seeing greater success in securing asylum in Immigration Court. While asylum grant rates declined during the Trump years to a low of just 29% in FY 2020, they climbed to 37% during FY 2021 after President Biden assumed office.

Focusing just on the most recent quarter (July — September 2021), asylum seekers success rate climbed to 49%, up even over the 44% success rate at the end of the Obama administration.


information from:

https://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/668/
 
Asylum Decisions by Nationality.

Depending upon the period of time, various nationalities have predominated among those seeking asylum. This section focuses on 19 leading countries from which asylum seekers have come over the past two decades in the USA. For these 19 nationality groups, the highest overall asylum success rates over the past two decades in Immigration Court have been persons from Nepal (73%)

the rest 18 nationality groups success rates below

Ethiopia (72%), China (67%),
Cameroon (66%) , Russia (66%).
Albania(56%), India (56%)
Somalia(54%), Armenia(54%)
Venezuela(49%), Cuba(39%)
Colombia(36%), Indonesia(32%)
Nicaragua(29%), El Salvador(20%)
Guatemala(19%), Haiti(18%)
Honduras(18%), Mexico(15%)


 
persecution includes, but not only limited to physical harm

The USA immigration law’s definition of "refugee” mentions the word "persecution" (See the Immigration and Nationality Act at I.N.A. Section 101(a)(42)).

The law, however, does not provide a separate definition of persecution, nor specifically list any types of harm that could qualify for consideration, except for the law that states people who have or fear being "forced to abort a pregnancy or to undergo involuntary sterilization...."

In most cases, asylum seekers must prove that their suffering or fear constitutes persecution. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals stated that "Persecution covers a range of acts and harms," and "[t]he determination that actions rise to the level of persecution is very fact-dependent."

The 7th Circuit noted nevertheless, that, "actions must rise above the level of mere ‘harassment' to constitute persecution."

The following types of harm can equate to persecution:

physical violence: for example, beating, assault, handcuffing, rape or sexual abuse, female genital mutilation, electric shocks, invasive physical examinations, forced abortion or sterilization, forced labor, and so on, whether or not this caused serious injuries or long-term damage or required medical attention

torture: a severe human rights violation that may involve physical violence, deliberate infliction of mental harm, prolonged unlawful detention, rape, and sexual violence, and so on

other violations of human rights: for example, genocide or slavery

threats of harm: particularly if the threatened harm is serious, caused emotional or psychological damage, or are credible, for example, because the persecutor has already inflicted harm on the person or his or her family or others similarly situated

unlawful detention: punishment for a regular crime is not persecution, but if the person is detained without due process or formal charges or for discriminatory or political reasons, this may rise to the level of persecution, particularly if the detention was combined with mistreatment

infliction of mental, emotional, or psychological harm: this can include intimidation, surveillance, interference with privacy, long-term threats, or being forced to engage in conduct that is not physically painful or harmful but is abhorrent to the person's deepest beliefs

substantial economic discrimination or harm: for example, deliberate deprivation of food, housing, employment, or other life essentials, or ransacking, destruction, or confiscation of property

other discrimination or harassment: for example, passport denial, pressure to become an informer, or restrictions on access to education; also, some applicants might need to show a combination of actions against them if none by themselves was serious to fit traditional understandings of persecution.

The 2019 Flow Report revealed the top ten countries whose citizens received grants of asylum from USCIS included (from most to least):

Venezuela
China
Egypt
Turkey
Russia
Guatemala
El Salvador
Mexico
Nigeria
Honduras.


The Flow Report also provides figures for the top ten countries whose citizens received grants of asylum in immigration court proceedings, including (from most to least):

China
El Salvador
India
Guatemala
Honduras
Mexico
Cuba
Cameroon
Nepal
Venezuela.