Hello everyone!
I’ve received two sets of GCMS notes for the same PR application:
Could this simply mean the sentence was always in GCMS and has now been un-redacted by ATIP, or is it possible the officer added new text to the old 10-Oct-2024 note—even though I already submitted the requested proof of funds in November and later received a note saying “All documents received and reviewed – Ready for PM3”?
Thanks!
I’ve received two sets of GCMS notes for the same PR application:
- April ATIP: In NOTE 10 (dated 2024-10-09, listing the requested documents/POF) there’s a blank line between two bullet points, and the page header shows “s. 16(1)(c)”, so it looks like that line was redacted.
- July ATIP: The exact same note now shows that missing line as:
“– Unable to validate liquidity and accessibility …”
and the s. 16(1)(c) header is gone.
Could this simply mean the sentence was always in GCMS and has now been un-redacted by ATIP, or is it possible the officer added new text to the old 10-Oct-2024 note—even though I already submitted the requested proof of funds in November and later received a note saying “All documents received and reviewed – Ready for PM3”?
Thanks!