GCMS, Group Name MI1-RFV docs pending vs MI1 docs pending

[maran1976]

Hello,

In the first page of the GCMS, I have noticed that some have

Group Name : MI1-RFV docs pending

and some have

Group Name : MI1 docs pending


Whats the difference between the two ? I did read here on the forum that RFV could mean Ready For Visa. Is this for real or just a guess?

Also, mine is MI1-RFV docs pending and the recent notes is as follows

NOTES:1
Created Date: 2012/05/10 (my inprocess date on Ecas)
Label: Elgibility
Text:
PA- PLS REQUEST THE FOLLOWING when instructed to do so XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX PA has obtained sufficient points to satisfy me that he/she will be able to become economically established in Canada. I am satisfied that the points awarded to the applicant adequately reflect the applicant's ability to settle in Canada.Proof of Funds OK. CRIM PASSES X 2. COpies of PPT review NO CONCERNS. Personal History NO CONCERNS

but I am wondering, with the RFV in the group name and the above notes , my APPLICATION ASSIGNMENT ( the BFD's ) is empty !
So, without Assigned To, By, Due Date, they have reached above conclusion ?

Thanks

 

[canadaprocess]

Did you get any update on this ?

I too in the similar situation, I received my GCMS today and have similar information.

Hello,

In the first page of the GCMS, I have noticed that some have

Group Name : MI1-RFV docs pending

and some have

Group Name : MI1 docs pending


Whats the difference between the two ? I did read here on the forum that RFV could mean Ready For Visa. Is this for real or just a guess?

Also, mine is MI1-RFV docs pending and the recent notes is as follows

NOTES:1
Created Date: 2012/05/10 (my inprocess date on Ecas)
Label: Elgibility
Text:
PA- PLS REQUEST THE FOLLOWING when instructed to do so XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX PA has obtained sufficient points to satisfy me that he/she will be able to become economically established in Canada. I am satisfied that the points awarded to the applicant adequately reflect the applicant's ability to settle in Canada.Proof of Funds OK. CRIM PASSES X 2. COpies of PPT review NO CONCERNS. Personal History NO CONCERNS

but I am wondering, with the RFV in the group name and the above notes , my APPLICATION ASSIGNMENT ( the BFD's ) is empty !
So, without Assigned To, By, Due Date, they have reached above conclusion ?

Thanks