Hi there!
I am still in the very early stages of thought regarding these issues but I have a few questions on family sponsorship.
Firstly some background. My girlfriend and I are currently in a long term (4 years) long distance relationship. She is Canadian and I am British. We are currently both enrolled in full time university courses. I graduate in just over a year and as it stands it's looking increasing likely that I will be the one to move over to Canada, provided that everything stays as it is now.
Given that we are both still young (21 and 22) and having both gone straight into higher education, we haven't had the chance to live together. This would discount common law partner as an avenue for immigration. Conjugal is also not a possibility as I believe our situation would not class as eligible for this route. Correct me if I'm wrong. We have spoken at length over the possibility of marriage and both agree we would like to marry but would obviously rather wait for a time when we are more settled. My first question is this; if we were to legally marry but without any real wedding celebrations or honeymoon ect ect on the premise that we will hold an event with all the formalities once we become settled, how would this be perceived on an application? Would they simply see it as committing fraud to enter Canada? Or, the truth (in our eyes); that we are doing this so that we can be together? I am aware that at the very best I could expect to be pulled for an interview, but how would it come across? At this point in time we would have nearly six years of proof of genuineness, would this be enough? Having no experience with immigration control, would they be compassionate and understanding or more hard line and likely to deny such an application?
The other route would be to get a work permit and live together in order to qualify as common law. However we would rather avoid the uncertainty of this route. Given that if anything goes wrong in the application such as processing time or denial I would be forced to return to Britain meaning the dismantling of anything that we might have put in place for the future. However if this is the best route to take then of course we would take it.
Thank you for taking the time to read this, I'm sure you have more interesting things to be doing! Having said that any and all advice is welcome. As I mentioned earlier this is still some ways off (although I am aware that the processing time can be as much as 18 months) so at the moment its all theoretical.
I look forward to discussing this further with you.
I am still in the very early stages of thought regarding these issues but I have a few questions on family sponsorship.
Firstly some background. My girlfriend and I are currently in a long term (4 years) long distance relationship. She is Canadian and I am British. We are currently both enrolled in full time university courses. I graduate in just over a year and as it stands it's looking increasing likely that I will be the one to move over to Canada, provided that everything stays as it is now.
Given that we are both still young (21 and 22) and having both gone straight into higher education, we haven't had the chance to live together. This would discount common law partner as an avenue for immigration. Conjugal is also not a possibility as I believe our situation would not class as eligible for this route. Correct me if I'm wrong. We have spoken at length over the possibility of marriage and both agree we would like to marry but would obviously rather wait for a time when we are more settled. My first question is this; if we were to legally marry but without any real wedding celebrations or honeymoon ect ect on the premise that we will hold an event with all the formalities once we become settled, how would this be perceived on an application? Would they simply see it as committing fraud to enter Canada? Or, the truth (in our eyes); that we are doing this so that we can be together? I am aware that at the very best I could expect to be pulled for an interview, but how would it come across? At this point in time we would have nearly six years of proof of genuineness, would this be enough? Having no experience with immigration control, would they be compassionate and understanding or more hard line and likely to deny such an application?
The other route would be to get a work permit and live together in order to qualify as common law. However we would rather avoid the uncertainty of this route. Given that if anything goes wrong in the application such as processing time or denial I would be forced to return to Britain meaning the dismantling of anything that we might have put in place for the future. However if this is the best route to take then of course we would take it.
Thank you for taking the time to read this, I'm sure you have more interesting things to be doing! Having said that any and all advice is welcome. As I mentioned earlier this is still some ways off (although I am aware that the processing time can be as much as 18 months) so at the moment its all theoretical.
I look forward to discussing this further with you.