- Feb 12, 2012
- 81
- 1
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Beijing
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- Jul-19-2012 and July 24, 2013
- Doc's Request.
- Note: Dependent had to be re-applied for in July 2013. Doc request on Sep-19-2013
- Nomination.....
- Second PPR Sep-19-2013
- AOR Received.
- DM1 Aug-28-2012/DM 1 Aug 21-2013
- Med's Done....
- Feb 2012, repeat X-rays requested April 30, 2013. Complete new Medical July 2013
- Interview........
- Waived/Waived
- Passport Req..
- Nov-22-2012 and second time on Sep 19-2013
- VISA ISSUED...
- May-29-2013 Decision Made on e-cas (DM2), and second time on January 14, 2013 June 7, 2013 COPR received, June 10,2013 COPR Returned to VO for correction, June 23, 2013 COPR received back, no correction made. Second COPR received January 23, 2014
- LANDED..........
- Landed July 5, 2013 (Spouse); Flagpole Landing for Dependent on Mar 14, 2014 PR Card Received Aug 1, 2014
Senior Members ?
How do you interpret the following statement ? It is from OPs Bulletin 2, Processing Members of the Family Class, Item 17. Referring to visa officers issuing visas.
"Explain in writing that all family members must travel with the principal applicant, or follow before
the expiry date on their visas. Family members, who arrive in Canada before the principal
applicant, will not become permanent residents"
In our case, my step-daughter is here in Canada studying with a study permit and Temporary Visa. What should we do to allow her to be included in her mom's application for PR ? We included her initially as non-accompanying and realize now that was a mistake. We want to know if we can request that be changed now to "accompanying". But,
1) Will she need to return to China, then "accompany" her mom? But she has already been in Canada, is that a problem?
2) Instead can she flagpole after her mom's arrival, so she arrives a second time but under her new PR visa and not the TRV ? Would this still be consistent with the OPs bulletin statement?
Confused about our path.
How do you interpret the following statement ? It is from OPs Bulletin 2, Processing Members of the Family Class, Item 17. Referring to visa officers issuing visas.
"Explain in writing that all family members must travel with the principal applicant, or follow before
the expiry date on their visas. Family members, who arrive in Canada before the principal
applicant, will not become permanent residents"
In our case, my step-daughter is here in Canada studying with a study permit and Temporary Visa. What should we do to allow her to be included in her mom's application for PR ? We included her initially as non-accompanying and realize now that was a mistake. We want to know if we can request that be changed now to "accompanying". But,
1) Will she need to return to China, then "accompany" her mom? But she has already been in Canada, is that a problem?
2) Instead can she flagpole after her mom's arrival, so she arrives a second time but under her new PR visa and not the TRV ? Would this still be consistent with the OPs bulletin statement?
Confused about our path.