Impact of Inadmissibility on Express Entry Application

[Boazz]

Hi Everyone,
I have a cousin who has just gotten an ITA under the express entry program. She is now very concerned whether her daughter's inadmissibility will affect her application.
She is divorced and her daughter is 23 years old which does not qualify as a dependent but she is her child. I will appreciate your advise.

 

[Naturgrl]

No issue.

 

[Boazz]

No issue.

How do you mean?

 

[Naturgrl]

How do you mean?

You asked if her daughter who is not a dependant impacts her application. I said it is not an issue.

 

[Boazz]

You asked if her daughter who is not a dependant impacts her application. I said it is not an issue.

Thanks for this information. But can you throw more light on this? Do you have any experience of someone in this situation before?

 

[iSaidGoodDay]

Thanks for this information. But can you throw more light on this? Do you have any experience of someone in this situation before?

https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...immigrate-canada/inadmissibility/reasons.html

It says "inadmissible family member". Since her daughter isn't a part of her application, she won't be impacted.

IIRC, it was "Section 42 of IRPA" focuses on accompanying family members, her daughter isn't accompanying.

 

[Boazz]

https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...immigrate-canada/inadmissibility/reasons.html

It says "inadmissible family member". Since her daughter isn't a part of her application, she won't be impacted.

IIRC, it was "Section 42 of IRPA" focuses on accompanying family members, her daughter isn't accompanying.

So guys,
I tried to advice her to go ahead with the application but she wants further assurance and I must admit, I was also not confident with my advise. I had no answer for her when she drew my attention to this:

• misrepresentation, which includes providing false information or withholding information directly related to decisions made under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA)
• failure to comply with any provision of IRPA<a href="https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...grate-canada/inadmissibility/reasons.html#fn2"><span>Footnote </span>2</a> or
• having an inadmissible family member.

 

[Boazz]

Section 42 of IRPA

But Section 42 of IRPA focuses on both accompanying and non-accompanying family member. Please check

 

[Naturgrl]

So guys,
I tried to advice her to go ahead with the application but she wants further assurance and I must admit, I was also not confident with my advise. I had no answer for her when she drew my attention to this:

• misrepresentation, which includes providing false information or withholding information directly related to decisions made under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA)
• failure to comply with any provision of IRPA<a href="https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...grate-canada/inadmissibility/reasons.html#fn2"><span>Footnote </span>2</a> or
• having an inadmissible family member.

If she wants further assurance then don't rely on a volunteer forum. Have her contact and get advice from an immigration lawyer.

 

[scylla]

So guys,
I tried to advice her to go ahead with the application but she wants further assurance and I must admit, I was also not confident with my advise. I had no answer for her when she drew my attention to this:

• misrepresentation, which includes providing false information or withholding information directly related to decisions made under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA)
• failure to comply with any provision of IRPA<a href="https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...grate-canada/inadmissibility/reasons.html#fn2"><span>Footnote </span>2</a> or
• having an inadmissible family member.

She should hire an immigration lawyer in that case.

 

[iSaidGoodDay]

But Section 42 of IRPA focuses on both accompanying and non-accompanying family member. Please check

Read what "non-accompanying" member's focus is in that doc. I also don't know the nature of what's inadmissible with her daughter either. If the nature of that is as big as national security, you need a lawyer for sure. Rest of her questions are the same that can be cleared from a "non-accompanying" focus.